Proving Creationism

Post by **Worm of Despite** » Fri Apr 29, 2011 2:47 am

Hey guys. I'm a Flat Earth Pagan. While also atheists, we Flat Earth Pagans espouse the belief that since the universe is arguably a flat plane in elliptical shape then that means the earth is even flatter (and also an elliptical, scarily enough). This constant reappearance of the elliptical shape in the cosmos draws one obviously to the Ptolemaic system, which stressed a series of elliptical-shaped firmaments or "spheres" that led up to heaven, with the earth at the center of the universe. Coincidence? No.

Basically the earth is 6,000 years old, and while I don't believe it was created by a God per se I'm pretty sure there was a sentient being or some kind of simulation-machine that activated all of this. Why? Because dinosaur bones were obviously put in the ground by another scientist working as a joke, since it's obvious there's no way such large beings could have existed.

Thoughts?

I'd like to hear from other creationists how you see the earth's time-line of existence and how it fits in the framework of your holy book of choice.

Post by **Hashi Lebwohl** » Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:32 am

Are you certain you are on the correct board? No one here thinks the Earth is 6,000 years old.

True sarcasm requires subtlety, though, so you need a little more practice.

Post by **Worm of Despite** » Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:33 am

Hashi Lebwohl wrote:No one here thinks the Earth is 6,000 years old.

Forsooth! Surely there's a wide dispersion of belief sets (a gamut of hard-line Catholics, neo-Pagans and those of us who vacillate between disbelief or agnosticism)? Those who I've seen defend the Bible stridently I might imagine wouldn't disagree with its strict time-line.

Hashi Lebwohl wrote:True sarcasm requires subtlety, though, so you need a little more practice.

Actually that was my best attempt at levity.

(Come on, the forum has a topic titled Depression). Ah well. Break a few eggs...

Post by **Cambo** » Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:36 am

Lord Foul wrote:(Come on, the forum has a topic titled Depression). Ah well. Break a few eggs...

And then cry myself to sleep, because I still haven't recovered from yesterday's spilt milk, god I can't do anything right, no-one loves me because I keep ruining their breakfast, all I want is to get laid...and an omlette

Post by **Cagliostro** » Fri Apr 29, 2011 1:32 pm

What about an occasional movie or play?

Post by **Hashi Lebwohl** » Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:28 pm

Lord Foul wrote:Actually that was my best attempt at levity. (Come on, the forum has a topic titled Depression). Ah well. Break a few eggs...

Oh, well then...I heartily support levity.

Post by **Worm of Despite** » Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:57 pm

Every forum needs at least one such topic, lest it become a swirling sarlaac pit of non-emotion. Be Ware, Traveler!

Post by **High Lord Tolkien** » Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:55 pm

I'm starting to believe in the Flat Earth Theory.
Think about it.
What is a map?
It's a drawing of the Earth.
Maps are almost always flat!
And what is the age of the oldest flat map?
Roughly around 6000 years old.
That's totally whack!

Check out Google Earth.
It's supposed to be "3D".
But look at Google Earth on your screen, touch it with your fingers.......it's FLAT!
You can't explain that.
No one can.

Post by **aliantha** » Fri Apr 29, 2011 9:02 pm

Wait a minute. Are you claiming that Earth Pagans are flat? I'm not sure I agree...

Post by **Worm of Despite** » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:07 am

aliantha wrote:Wait a minute. Are you claiming that Earth Pagans are flat? I'm not sure I agree...

The male ones are. Zing!

Post by **Fist and Faith** » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:43 am

I was gonna say, I've seen some Earth Pagans who are stacked!

Post by **Loredoctor** » Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:41 am

C.K. Chesterton is round therefore the Earth is round.

I case my rest.

Post by **Vain** » Sat Apr 30, 2011 11:24 am

Water proves the existence of the creator

Post by **peter** » Fri May 20, 2011 4:03 pm

Is Creationism just where you believe there was the involvement of a 'Creator' somwhere in the scheme of things - even if it was just to set the (for example) Laws of Physics in motion so the Universe could be formed, or does it have to be where you deny i) the evolution of species from a common origin, ii) the age of the earth as being in the billions of years, and affirm iii) that the earth was created in seven (24 hour) days as per the biblical account in Genesis.

Also (if it's not too far of topic) I'm reading Stephen Hawking's new book "The grand Design" and he says in the second paragraph of whether the Universe needed a Creator, "Traditionally these are questions for philososophy, but philosophy is dead. Philosophy has not kept up with modern developments in science, particularly physics."

What do you guys think of that - given particularly that it comes from what has to be one of the smartest men alive?

Post by **Worm of Despite** » Fri May 20, 2011 4:09 pm

Loremaster wrote:

C.K. Chesterton is round therefore the Earth is round.

I case my rest.

Interesting giant baby you have. Trade?

Post by **Vraith** » Fri May 20, 2011 4:28 pm

peter wrote: "Traditionally these are questions for philososophy, but philosophy is dead. Philosophy has not kept up with modern developments in science, particularly physics."

What do you guys think of that - given particularly that it comes from what has to be one of the smartest men alive?

I'd say he's wrong...there is a metric f-load of philosophy engaging with science, including physics.

Post by **Worm of Despite** » Fri May 20, 2011 5:31 pm

Vraith wrote:
peter wrote: "Traditionally these are questions for philososophy, but philosophy is dead. Philosophy has not kept up with modern developments in science, particularly physics."

What do you guys think of that - given particularly that it comes from what has to be one of the smartest men alive?
I'd say he's wrong...there is a metric f-load of philosophy engaging with science, including physics.

DAMN IT ALL. Every f*cking silly thread I make turns into a legitimate discussion.

I have to stop this. Here goes:

Kittens. Checkers. Quack. Winston Churchill. Neville Chamberlain dancing at the Berghof.

Post by **Vraith** » Fri May 20, 2011 6:45 pm

Lord Foul wrote:
Vraith wrote:
peter wrote: "Traditionally these are questions for philososophy, but philosophy is dead. Philosophy has not kept up with modern developments in science, particularly physics."

What do you guys think of that - given particularly that it comes from what has to be one of the smartest men alive?
I'd say he's wrong...there is a metric f-load of philosophy engaging with science, including physics.
DAMN IT ALL. Every f*cking silly thread I make turns into a legitimate discussion.

I have to stop this. Here goes:

Kittens. Checkers. Quack. Winston Churchill. Neville Chamberlain dancing at the Berghof.

This is very odd...when I quote your actual post, I'm seeing a completely different post while I'm typing here...I wonder what it will look like when I submit?
Anyway, I was expecting someone to ask for the definition of a metric f-load, or how one weighs philosophy. FWIW, Creationism is governed by the basic equations E=MCsquared, where E is egregiousness, M is malaprops, a measure of actual science used in inappropriate ways, C is "Chestertons," a constant standing for the velocity of verbiage in a vacuum.

Post by **High Lord Tolkien** » Fri May 20, 2011 6:53 pm

Lord Foul wrote:
Loremaster wrote:

C.K. Chesterton is round therefore the Earth is round.

I case my rest.
Interesting giant baby you have. Trade?

Post by **stonemaybe** » Fri May 20, 2011 6:55 pm

I agree that the earth is flat, LF, but I propose that it exists on both sides of the plane!

The northern hemi"sphere" is on top, the southern on the bottom, with the poles in the middle. The only way to get from one side to the other is to pass through the bipolar warpway.

Kevin's Watch

Kevin's Watch

Proving Creationism

Proving Creationism