Layout changes

Post by **A Gunslinger** » Mon Dec 18, 2006 5:00 pm

Elfgirl wrote:Oh sure, you guys may have peters, but do you have the pauls to carry it through?

To say nothing of the mary's.

Post by **Waddley** » Mon Dec 18, 2006 5:49 pm

Esmer wrote:oh, sorry, didn't realize how out of it you were, scene-wise....Lucimay called, she wants her legwarmers back....

*sniff* *sniff* I'm sorry I'm not cool like you... you don't have to rub it in my face...

Post by **lucimay** » Mon Dec 18, 2006 5:51 pm

Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:
Esmer wrote:oh, sorry, didn't realize how out of it you were, scene-wise....Lucimay called, she wants her legwarmers back....
*sniff* *sniff* I'm sorry I'm not cool like you... you don't have to rub it in my face...

don't cry Wadds, he thinks calling girls dude is hip.

(we had the same problem with "chick" back in the 70's. urg)

Post by **Waddley** » Mon Dec 18, 2006 5:57 pm

Haha.... I call everyone dude. Dude is an amazing word that fits into any situation imaginable.

Post by **The Laughing Man** » Mon Dec 18, 2006 5:59 pm

oh really? would the real Waddley please stAND up?

Dude
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Though dude had been applied to women as early as the mid-70's, its use came to a tipping point somewhere in the mid-80's. Attempts to establish dudette as the feminine form failed (the original term for a fine-looking woman among Hawaiian surfers, wahine, never established itself either) and it is now a fact that dude, at least in the prescriptive sense, can refer to both men and women. Perhaps the first mainstream display of this usage appeared in the movie Less Than Zero, in which there is a scene where a young woman defiantly tells her mother, "No way, dude!". Indeed, even American Heritage Dictionary recognizes this in its dude definition 3.b., that "dudes" are "Persons of either sex". According to Jesse Sheidlower, the North American editor of the Oxford English Dictionary, it is a topic (of walking distinctions) of interest amongst linguists and lexicographers whether dude in the descriptive ("that dude"), rather than the prescriptive ("hey dude") sense can be applied to both men and women (See The Sexual Transmigration of Dude). The latter is generally a non-specific exclamation which can be directed at, but not precisely applied to any certain person. The former is rarely applied to a woman; in fact doing so is sometimes a derogatory expression of a woman's over-masculinity ("she's quite a dude").

I can't believe you said "hip", Luci.....

Post by **Blackhawk** » Fri Apr 04, 2008 7:15 am

I cant see any of the pics people are talking about... old links or are they in the gallery now?

Post by **Vain** » Fri Apr 04, 2008 10:08 am

They're erm...I have no idea what they were

Post by **Avatar** » Fri Apr 04, 2008 10:19 am

Haha, look at the date of that post with the pics.

--A

Post by **Vain** » Fri Apr 04, 2008 11:25 am

hehehe

Yes - goes to prove we've been around before the web

Post by **balon!** » Fri Apr 04, 2008 8:41 pm

Seriously.

I thought it was some sort of joke when I saw the 1969 thing. Has the Watch seriously been around THAT long? Good lord!

Post by **Avatar** » Fri Apr 04, 2008 8:47 pm

It was some kinda joke.

A hack from before my time changed the date of the first year on phpBB or something.

Check the stats page, posts per month.

I forget about it usually.

--A

Post by **balon!** » Fri Apr 04, 2008 9:23 pm

Avatar wrote: It was some kinda joke.

A hack from before my time changed the date of the first year on phpBB or something. Check the stats page, posts per month. I forget about it usually.

--A

Okay, good. I thought I was going crazy for a second.

Maybe Gore really DID have the internet in his basement back in the day......

Post by **MsMary** » Fri Apr 04, 2008 11:27 pm

You never know.

Kevin's Watch

Kevin's Watch

Layout changes

Layout changes