Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:18 am
There have always been elements of the storys ocuring in our world (or the Chrons version of it) eg Fouls influence on the sect at the start of the second Chrons, the 'old beggar man', even Drools 'laval eyes if I remember at one point. So in theory there was/is no reason per se why this should not occur. It just doesn't seem quite right though - to me at least. Do we want a Chrons where the seeting is just 'scenery'. Where Donaldson forgoes the beauty and worth of the Land that we have in the first series, the terrible perversion of the Land that we have in the second. The Land is a key player in the trilogies as much as any of the protagonists themselves. Do we really want to reduce the Land to ....well...land.