Demondim in dusguise?Nerdanel wrote: I also have a truly radical theory about Esmer in the works...



Moderator: dlbpharmd
Demondim in dusguise?Nerdanel wrote: I also have a truly radical theory about Esmer in the works...
Aroused? That's pretty hard to define. Erection doesn't automatically equal arousal. A good case in point is men who are raped by other men and then think that they are gay, or that it wasn't rape and that they enjoyed it, because they got an erection during the violation. However, the erection is caused by the stimulation of the thousands of nerve endings in the groin region, not by any real sense of enjoyment.finn wrote:I think you'll find that a man can rape a woman but a woman cannot rape a man. The legalities are I believe, tied up in the act itself, if a man is capable and aroused for the act, it is deemed that he is an 'active' party and in effect consenting.