In the ultimate irony it appears that we in the West, having spent years alienating and demonising Iran, will now be needing to butter them up to step up to the plate and help fill the shortfall that the decision to stop oil imports from Russia will create. Similarly, our need for oil will further demand that we keep on-side with the odious regime in Saudi Arabia, already engaged in its own very questionable activities in the Yemen.
Such is the elasticity of our high-handed approach to the rest of the world, when it comes to looking after our own interest.
In a further ratcheting up of the dangers of this situation, Poland has announced that it will deliver its entire MiG-29 fleet to the Ramstein air base in Germany, where the US forces will then oversee their transfer to the pre-trained pilots of the Ukrainian air force. How the Russians will respond to this remains to be seen, but they will undoubtedly regard it as intervention of some kind. It would be naive not to see the American hand behind this, even though it is done at a distance via the agency of Poland. Three guesses as to which country the Russians will exact any reprisals upon.
And meanwhile, President Zelensky addresses a packed House of Commons via video link from his Kiev redoubt, in a rousing speech lifted directly from that of Winston Churchill (fight them on the beaches - you know the schtick). Our saucer eyed MPs seemed to take it well enough (hear, hears and standing ovations etc) as have our fawning press, but whether his calls for the West to enforce the much requested no-fly zone will be heeded, remains to be seen. (I suppose that the fighter jets from Poland are in part a response to this.)
Hey Z! Nice to see you man!
I tend to post here because what I say is mostly opinion and I don't 'do the research' to the depth that I feel the tank warrants.
There are moves in the UK to lift the two year moratorium on fracking in order to help make up the shortfall that the Russian oil/gas embargo will cause. Sounds reasonable, but it will no doubt elicit the same environmental concerns on this side of the pond as in the US.
But at the moment, this all seems to be going in the one direction - that of escalation. I'm pressed to see a way of stopping this other than the one I have outlined above (which is clearly unpalatable to many for obvious reasons).
What a complete fuck-up our so called leaders have made of this world. They've battered the shit out of it with their now discredited response to the Covid threat, and in it's punch-drunk state are leading it reeling into a new cold war (at best) and further economic punishment. How much, exactly, do they think it can stand? Our systems are fragile at best, 'just-in-time' and always teetering on the edge of disaster. Carry on like this and the only jumping we'll be doing is back into the frikkin' stone-age. Bet all those tech billionaires are pleased they've got their New-Zealand hideouts sorted out now. Hope they've got good bunkers and lots of old vids!
Edit: Couple of other points I forgot to mention. As per usual, our mainstream media cannot be trusted to present a balanced picture of what is going on, preferring instead to go for the 'black and white' narrative that plays into the easier to understand version of events that our administration would rather we held. Take for example the presentation of the Russian people's response to Putin's war of aggression. Our broadcast media go almost exclusively for the expression of anti-war sentiment in Russia, focusing on the (undoubtedly) heavy-handed response of the state to any kind of deviation from the view that the war is entirely justified.
But this of course, is not the whole story. There is much popular sentiment in support of what Putin is doing, as evidenced by the rise of the social media inspired 'Z' movement, in which Russians from across the board sport Z emblems in demonstration of their support for their own forces. In fairness, I saw this story on the BBC news page on its website, but there has been no widespread coverage to speak of on televised news outlets. Of course, in Russia as elsewhere, there will be opinion on both sides of the argument, some being n favour and others against. I just wish our media could be more trusting of our ability to understand this - not deciding that it must play the role of moulding public opinion rather than simply presenting facts upon which people can form their own views. I'm aware that this has ever been the case, but still, it rankles........
I also heard a report that the administration in China had been forced to present more clearly its position in respect of the Ukrainian invasion (I'm not sure how so, but so it was said) and in so doing had issued a bullet-point style statement of where it stood. It seemed to be a surprisingly balanced position, in which it unequivocally damned the Russian actions in invading a sovereign state and recognised the right of Ukraine to exist as an autonomous nation, but simultaneously recognised the justified concerns of Russia pertaining to NATO expansion toward its western borders. China has much to answer for in its own behaviour toward its neighbouring countries, but in this case at least, it seemed to be taking an entirely reasonable position. Would that our leadership could have been so reasonable in the pursuit of its foreign policy that has played no small part in the precipitation of this crisis.
The truth is a Lion and does not need protection. Once free it will look after itself.
....and the glory of the world becomes less than it was....
'Have we not served you well'
'Of course - you know you have.'
'Then let it end.'
We are the Bloodguard