Textual Reliability of the Bible

Free discussion of anything human or divine ~ Philosophy, Religion and Spirituality

Moderator: Fist and Faith

User avatar
lucimay
Lord
Posts: 15045
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Mott Wood, Genebakis
Contact:

Post by lucimay »

Holsety wrote:
Perceptions vary, especially when we speak of the metaphysical, and of history. I do not think people who have different interpretations of history to be inherently dishonest. There are people who care more about other things than an honest telling of history obviously, but when you speak of religious history, as reported by the faithful of that religion, alterations are attempted for accuracy rather than for deception.
If this is true, it underscores a deeper "problem." If the scholars were "fixing" divinely inspired works, then the definition of divinely inspired works cannot describe something perfect. And that the scholars then felt this way too, and did not see the NT as written by matthew, mark, and everyone else as the absolute word of god.

Xar, while I think your views on the bible make sense, I feel like the same can be said for other books. That is, if the bible is a work which is primarily anagogic (I learned that word from bakker thank you very much, so sorry if it's applied poorly)...what makes it unique among the already unique? It's one of many amazing works with deep stuff going on, but unless one starts with faith in it for a particular reason, you can only accept the bible as THE way if you can objectively judge it as "better" than anything else.
this is a :goodpost:
you're more advanced than a cockroach,
have you ever tried explaining yourself
to one of them?
~ alan bates, the mothman prophecies



i've had this with actors before, on the set,
where they get upset about the [size of my]
trailer, and i'm always like...take my trailer,
cause... i'm from Kentucky
and that's not what we brag about.
~ george clooney, inside the actor's studio



a straight edge for legends at
the fold - searching for our
lost cities of gold. burnt tar,
gravel pits. sixteen gears switch.
Haphazard Lucy strolls by.
~ dennis r wood ~
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 62038
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Post by Avatar »

Holsety wrote:I I think they do consider both to be holy in some way.
All semitic religions hold the 1st five books of the old testament largely in common, IIRC. The books of Law, aren't they?

From their I think there is divergence, but they are certainly granted an official measure of respect, as are the prophets and even Jesus (as a prophet).

--A
Post Reply

Return to “The Close”