Darth Revan wrote:
No... anyone who sacrifices themselves don't do it unless they think they're lower than the thing they are sacrificing themselves for. They don't do it for altruistic reasons.
Sacrificing yourself for your perception of a greater good serves to make you feel good (for the three seconds before you die) but it's unlikely that the reason for the sacrifice is that feeling. Yes, the person may think that whoever he is saving is better for the world than he would be, but if that is the case, what possible selfish motive may there be? Low self-esteem perhaps, but selfishness?
Much as I realise that in a sense I caused you to start this thread by pointing out somewhere that altuism may be inherently selfish, I find myself having to disagree with you.
Yes,
on the whole it may be considered that way, and in terms of the little things, like giving money to a beggar, perhaps it even
is that way. But when it comes to dying so that others may live, or suffering to help prevent the suffering of others, I'm not sure that the same rules can apply.
We must never forget that we are,
per force, generalising. As I've pointed out frequently, the
possible existence of an ulterior motive (especially a sub-conscious one) in no way negates the good that may arise from an action. (Not that you've said it does).
Darth Revan wrote:Furls Fire wrote:My brother, Stephen.
Altruism personified.
Furls, much as your brother ruled; and you know I don't mean any disrespect here, he was still human... there in lies the flaw into altruism. A human can't be altruistic; it's just that simple.
How do you define altruism?
I've always steered clear of anything to do with Furl's brother, and obviously I know only what has been randomly posted about him, as I've assiduously avoided the memorial thread. I know that you mean no disrespect here, and nor do I, when I say that I
could argue a selfish motive based on what I gather of his faith. I won't argue that however, not for fear of offending, but because I'm reasonably sure that it is not true.
I think that to reduce every good deed to how it made the "doer" feel is to ignore the true value of it. (not that you've argued otherwise).
I think it comes down to exactly what you mean by altruism.
Peace
--Avatar