What fantasy/science fiction book are you reading RIGHT NOW?

A place for anything *not* Donaldson.

Moderator: I'm Murrin

User avatar
Orlion
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 6666
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:30 am
Location: Getting there...
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by Orlion »

deer of the dawn wrote:Reading The Way of Kings by Brandon Sanderson. I'm all about character development and finding it a little slow. Still, I'm 300 pages in, may as well finish, although if the pointless battle is still going on by the end of the book I may decline the rest of the series.
I'm at around the 900 page mark. I kinda view the Vengeance War as a sort of setting, so I do not know if it will be resolved. Kinda need the bridgemen for Kaladin's character arch.

Then again, I'm enjoying it... even Shallan's portions! (apparently, a bunch complained about her as having an unclear role in the series...impatient folk :lol: Apparently the sequel focuses on her much how this book focuses on Kaladin).

I've been watching the reboot Doctor Who series and really enjoying! I'm new to the Doctor. How do the books compare? My sister has been a Whovian forever and she said the old series was more about killing monsters, whereas the new series was more "emotional" (her word); that is, character development. :)
A fairly accurate assessment to the show. I just always viewed it as a fun sci-fi show (with the classic series being a bit more pulpish)... I kinda find it ridiculous how a lot of Americans take it waaaay too seriously. It's like a friend of mine watching the Star Trek episodes in order before watching any of the movies "to avoid spoilers"... lighten up!
'Tis dream to think that Reason can
Govern the reasoning creature, man.
- Herman Melville

I am Lazarus, come from the dead,
Come back to tell you all, I shall tell you all!

"All creation is a huge, ornate, imaginary, and unintended fiction; if it could be deciphered it would yield a single shocking word."
-John Crowley
User avatar
ussusimiel
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 5346
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 12:34 am
Location: Waterford (milking cows), and sometimes still Dublin, Ireland

Post by ussusimiel »

Nearly finished The Farseer Trilogy by Robin Hobb.

This is my second run at it and I am enjoying it more this time (I didn't finish it the last time). It's one of the better straight-forward fantasy series that I have read. It's a bit grim at times but never really slips over into the 'grimdark' of Martin or Abercrombie.

Hobb writes well and there's really only one criticism I'd have of the books, which is that they constantly feel overwritten/under-edited. It may be a matter of pacing. Sometimes I found that I could skip up to two pages without missing anything important. I know that some people enjoy the extended immersion in the fantasy world, but I prefer good pacing and shorter books to extensive description and immersion (and thus longer books).

u.
Tho' all the maps of blood and flesh
Are posted on the door,
There's no one who has told us yet
What Boogie Street is for.
User avatar
Menolly
A Lowly Harper
Posts: 24184
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 12:29 am
Location: Harper Hall, Fort Hold, Northern Continent, Pern...
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 15 times
Contact:

Post by Menolly »

Finished my reread of Patricia Brigg's Mercy Thompson universe, and read the latest in that series, Night Broken. I'm really enjoying her interplay of the fae, the artifact, and Coyote.

Had to update my Kindle for PC, as the version I had expired earlier this month, but have downloaded Undertow by Lynn Cantwell. Will leap in to that starting tomorrow.
Image
User avatar
MsMary
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 7126
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 pm
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Post by MsMary »

deer of the dawn wrote:
I've been watching the reboot Doctor Who series and really enjoying! I'm new to the Doctor. How do the books compare? My sister has been a Whovian forever and she said the old series was more about killing monsters, whereas the new series was more "emotional" (her word); that is, character development. :)
I've watched every Doctor Who episode that has been on television. I wouldn't say the difference between the classic Doctor Who and the new Who is that the new Who has more character development. There were some really great characters in classic Who. There wasn't as much emotional attachment of the companions to the Doctor in the classic serials, though. But I just love some of those classic TV stories. And it's fun seeing how the Doctor's personality changes with each regeneration.

The books are very variable. Some are good stories and some are quite weird and a little difficult to follow. Some of them deviate quite a bit from TV canon, and that goes for both the "good" stories and the "hard to understand" stories.

The other thing I have been doing is listening to Big Finish Doctor Who audio dramas. They are quite fun. I try to get them on sale. And the price of the first 50 "main range" audio drama releases was permanently cut in honor of the 50th anniversary of Doctor Who, so you don't need to spend a fortune to sample them. You can try some for free here:
https://soundcloud.com/big-finish/sets/ ... big-finish
"The Cheat is GROUNDED! We had that lightswitch installed for you so you could turn the lights on and off, not so you could throw lightswitch raves!"
***************************************
- I'm always all right.
- Is all right special Time Lord code for really not all right at all?

- You're all irresponsible fools!
- The Doctor: But we're very experienced irresponsible fools.



Image


__________________________

THOOLAH member since 2005

EZBoard Survivor
User avatar
MsMary
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 7126
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 pm
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Post by MsMary »

Orlion wrote:
deer of the dawn wrote:
I've been watching the reboot Doctor Who series and really enjoying! I'm new to the Doctor. How do the books compare? My sister has been a Whovian forever and she said the old series was more about killing monsters, whereas the new series was more "emotional" (her word); that is, character development. :)
A fairly accurate assessment to the show. I just always viewed it as a fun sci-fi show (with the classic series being a bit more pulpish)... I kinda find it ridiculous how a lot of Americans take it waaaay too seriously. It's like a friend of mine watching the Star Trek episodes in order before watching any of the movies "to avoid spoilers"... lighten up!
Not quite sure how to take your remarks here, Orlion. What constitutes taking a show too seriously? And what makes you think it's only Americans who do it? I don't see any evidence that Americans are the only ones who wish to avoid spoilers.

Do you avoid spoilers in a book? Don't we have spoiler tags here to avoid spoiling a book (or movie or TV show) for someone before they read it (or watch it)?
"The Cheat is GROUNDED! We had that lightswitch installed for you so you could turn the lights on and off, not so you could throw lightswitch raves!"
***************************************
- I'm always all right.
- Is all right special Time Lord code for really not all right at all?

- You're all irresponsible fools!
- The Doctor: But we're very experienced irresponsible fools.



Image


__________________________

THOOLAH member since 2005

EZBoard Survivor
User avatar
Orlion
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 6666
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:30 am
Location: Getting there...
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by Orlion »

MsMary wrote:
Orlion wrote:
deer of the dawn wrote:
I've been watching the reboot Doctor Who series and really enjoying! I'm new to the Doctor. How do the books compare? My sister has been a Whovian forever and she said the old series was more about killing monsters, whereas the new series was more "emotional" (her word); that is, character development. :)
A fairly accurate assessment to the show. I just always viewed it as a fun sci-fi show (with the classic series being a bit more pulpish)... I kinda find it ridiculous how a lot of Americans take it waaaay too seriously. It's like a friend of mine watching the Star Trek episodes in order before watching any of the movies "to avoid spoilers"... lighten up!
Not quite sure how to take your remarks here, Orlion.
You should take it as a personal attack on all you hold dear:P ;)
What constitutes taking a show too seriously? And what makes you think it's only Americans who do it? I don't see any evidence that Americans are the only ones who wish to avoid spoilers.
When you are worried about "spoilers" from a show like Doctor Who, you are taking it too seriously. I understand that we do not know if the Doctor will succeed... there are times I believe the Daleks will finally gain the upperhand... and we certainly NEVER know when the Doctor is going to regenerate weeks in advance:roll: Doctor Who is fun as Doctor Who, there's no need to pretend that it is this masterpiece of plot development and suspense... because it is not, and one does a disservice to it when they treat it as such.
Do you avoid spoilers in a book?


Only because I read books others do not. I knew everything about A Song of Ice and Fire before I read the first three books (those fans don't care who they hurt :lol:) and I still found them enjoyable. Spoilers rarely spoil good pieces of literature.... after all, you never here someone say: spoiler alert! Dr Jekyll is really Mr. Hyde!
'Tis dream to think that Reason can
Govern the reasoning creature, man.
- Herman Melville

I am Lazarus, come from the dead,
Come back to tell you all, I shall tell you all!

"All creation is a huge, ornate, imaginary, and unintended fiction; if it could be deciphered it would yield a single shocking word."
-John Crowley
User avatar
MsMary
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 7126
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 pm
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Post by MsMary »

Orlion wrote:
MsMary wrote:
Orlion wrote: A fairly accurate assessment to the show. I just always viewed it as a fun sci-fi show (with the classic series being a bit more pulpish)... I kinda find it ridiculous how a lot of Americans take it waaaay too seriously. It's like a friend of mine watching the Star Trek episodes in order before watching any of the movies "to avoid spoilers"... lighten up!
Not quite sure how to take your remarks here, Orlion.
You should take it as a personal attack on all you hold dear. :P ;)
Haha. :) Okay, I won't. But I'll still say my piece about it. :)
Orlion wrote:
MsMary wrote:What constitutes taking a show too seriously? And what makes you think it's only Americans who do it? I don't see any evidence that Americans are the only ones who wish to avoid spoilers.
When you are worried about "spoilers" from a show like Doctor Who, you are taking it too seriously. I understand that we do not know if the Doctor will succeed... there are times I believe the Daleks will finally gain the upperhand... and we certainly NEVER know when the Doctor is going to regenerate weeks in advance:roll: Doctor Who is fun as Doctor Who, there's no need to pretend that it is this masterpiece of plot development and suspense... because it is not, and one does a disservice to it when they treat it as such.
See, I disagree with you here. Yes, we do know the Doctor will always succeed in the end and the Doctor's regeneration to the next Doctor is always announced well in advance, but we don't know how these things will happen. And frankly, I find it more fun to be surprised by the various plot developments that lead to the ending of the story, whether or not the show is some great masterpiece, so I do avoid spoilers. I like to be surprised when I watch an episode of a show for the first time, and I often am. It adds to my enjoyment.

And this is not strictly an American thing or a thing of any other particular national or ethnic group. I communicate with a lot of people from all over who avoid spoilers for a similar reason that I do. And some who don't (including Americans) because they either don't care or they would rather know in advance what is coming.

In fact, I was amused to read that Russell T. Davies and Steven Moffat, who have both been show runners and script writers for Doctor Who, try to avoid spoilers for each others' episodes.
Orlion wrote:
MsMary wrote:Do you avoid spoilers in a book?
Only because I read books others do not. I knew everything about A Song of Ice and Fire before I read the first three books (those fans don't care who they hurt :lol:) and I still found them enjoyable. Spoilers rarely spoil good pieces of literature.... after all, you never here someone say: spoiler alert! Dr Jekyll is really Mr. Hyde!
Okay, I'll grant you that spoilers won't spoil a good piece of literature. But that doesn't mean I need to go out of my way to find out about the book before I read it. Even if a book is well-known or talked about on the web, I avoid finding out about it or reading spoilers if I think I'm going to read it because, again, I like to be surprised by plot developments.

Even though the details of the Sherlock Holmes stories are well-known, I avoided talk about the BBC Show "Sherlock" till I had seen the episodes, because I didn't know how Moffat and Gatiss would write the episodes to give them a modern twist. And I'm glad I did, because, having re-watched the shows, you don't get the same impact of surprise when you know what's coming.

I will say I do draw the line at avoiding spoilers in the case of movies and TV shows made from books I am very familiar with, like Ender's Game, Harry Potter, or a Game of Thrones.

Obviously, not everyone cares about spoilers, and you seem to be one of those people. Good for you. I can't quibble with that.

But don't disparage those who do. And no need to make false generalizations by attributing it to only one group of people when there's actually no evidence that the generalization is accurate.
"The Cheat is GROUNDED! We had that lightswitch installed for you so you could turn the lights on and off, not so you could throw lightswitch raves!"
***************************************
- I'm always all right.
- Is all right special Time Lord code for really not all right at all?

- You're all irresponsible fools!
- The Doctor: But we're very experienced irresponsible fools.



Image


__________________________

THOOLAH member since 2005

EZBoard Survivor
User avatar
Fist and Faith
Magister Vitae
Posts: 25450
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 57 times

Post by Fist and Faith »

I'm gonna have to oppose Orlion on this one. I've watched many episodes of, say, Star Trek many times each. Who can explain why there's any enjoyment from again seeing a show that I can, literally, quote? But the enjoyment is there, explainable or not.

BUT! I sure as hell will not tolerate anybody telling me what's going to happen when I'm watching it for the first time! You kidding??? I'll make fun of various aspects of Trek as much as anyone else. John Belushi as Kirk! The Trek-porn video, with Sexy Female Spock, Sexy Female Doctor McCoy, etc, on The IT Crowd! Fantastic stuff! That doesn't mean you get to ruin my first viewing of anything!
All lies and jest
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest
-Paul Simon

Image
User avatar
Orlion
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 6666
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:30 am
Location: Getting there...
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by Orlion »

MsMary wrote:
Orlion wrote:
MsMary wrote:What constitutes taking a show too seriously? And what makes you think it's only Americans who do it? I don't see any evidence that Americans are the only ones who wish to avoid spoilers.
When you are worried about "spoilers" from a show like Doctor Who, you are taking it too seriously. I understand that we do not know if the Doctor will succeed... there are times I believe the Daleks will finally gain the upperhand... and we certainly NEVER know when the Doctor is going to regenerate weeks in advance:roll: Doctor Who is fun as Doctor Who, there's no need to pretend that it is this masterpiece of plot development and suspense... because it is not, and one does a disservice to it when they treat it as such.
See, I disagree with you here. Yes, we do know the Doctor will always succeed in the end and the Doctor's regeneration to the next Doctor is always announced well in advance, but we don't know how these things will happen. And frankly, I find it more fun to be surprised by the various plot developments that lead to the ending of the story, whether or not the show is some great masterpiece, so I do avoid spoilers. I like to be surprised when I watch an episode of a show for the first time, and I often am. It adds to my enjoyment.

And this is not strictly an American thing or a thing of any other particular national or ethnic group. I communicate with a lot of people from all over who avoid spoilers for a similar reason that I do. And some who don't (including Americans) because they either don't care or they would rather know in advance what is coming.

In fact, I was amused to read that Russell T. Davies and Steven Moffat, who have both been show runners and script writers for Doctor Who, try to avoid spoilers for each others' episodes.
That's interesting, even as it is somewhat incomprehensible to me ;)

Allow me to explain: one of the biggest appeals shows like Dr. Who, Star Trek, Quantum Leap, Keeping up Appearences, Father Ted, etc. have to me is that with the exception of some multi-episode story lines, I can enjoy a random episode (or story, in the Case of Dr. Who) without worrying about missing anything. I don't have to catch up on five seasons, I just have to watch whatever episode I happen to get my mittens on! And why would we want to ruin that with worries about spoilers? Should one watch all the surviving episodes of classic Dr. Who before the new incarnation spoils Daleks, Cybermen, Davros, The Master, etc? Not at all, because it is not necessary! (only the Tom Baker episodes are required viewing :P)

But I will stand corrected at assuming this obsession with spoilers is merely American.
Orlion wrote:
MsMary wrote:Do you avoid spoilers in a book?
Only because I read books others do not. I knew everything about A Song of Ice and Fire before I read the first three books (those fans don't care who they hurt :lol:) and I still found them enjoyable. Spoilers rarely spoil good pieces of literature.... after all, you never here someone say: spoiler alert! Dr Jekyll is really Mr. Hyde!
Okay, I'll grant you that spoilers won't spoil a good piece of literature. But that doesn't mean I need to go out of my way to find out about the book before I read it. Even if a book is well-known or talked about on the web, I avoid finding out about it or reading spoilers if I think I'm going to read it because, again, I like to be surprised by plot developments.
No issues here.
Even though the details of the Sherlock Holmes stories are well-known, I avoided talk about the BBC Show "Sherlock" till I had seen the episodes, because I didn't know how Moffat and Gatiss would write the episodes to give them a modern twist. And I'm glad I did, because, having re-watched the shows, you don't get the same impact of surprise when you know what's coming.
Funny you should mention that, I walked in on some friends watching the final 15 minutes of the third episode of the third season. Now, keep in mind I haven't watched the second season, so the friends were all like, "No! You can't watch this! It'll spoil it!" To which I replied, "Piss off!" and watched it anyway. For me, it did not ruin the experience, but neither would I mention casually. I do have SOME tact.
I will say I do draw the line at avoiding spoilers in the case of movies and TV shows made from books I am very familiar with, like Ender's Game, Harry Potter, or a Game of Thrones.

Obviously, not everyone cares about spoilers, and you seem to be one of those people. Good for you. I can't quibble with that.
Indeed, good for me!
But don't disparage those who do. And no need to make false generalizations by attributing it to only one group of people when there's actually no evidence that the generalization is accurate.
I do not mind a healthy avoidance of spoilers, say like what you have. What bothers me is when EVERYTHING is considered a spoiler... I won't actively reveal secrets, but if one were to get stressed out that the most recent episode of the Big Bang Theory is going to be spoiled because they can't watch it immediately, I might advise that one take a :chill:
Fist wrote:That doesn't mean you get to ruin my first viewing of anything!
Well, with Star Trek I really don't need to a lot of the time... the shows do it just fine on their own :P
Last edited by Orlion on Wed Apr 02, 2014 3:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
'Tis dream to think that Reason can
Govern the reasoning creature, man.
- Herman Melville

I am Lazarus, come from the dead,
Come back to tell you all, I shall tell you all!

"All creation is a huge, ornate, imaginary, and unintended fiction; if it could be deciphered it would yield a single shocking word."
-John Crowley
User avatar
MsMary
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 7126
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 pm
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Post by MsMary »

Orlion wrote:I do not mind a healthy avoidance of spoilers, say like what you have. What bothers me is when EVERYTHING is considered a spoiler... I won't actively reveal secrets, but if one were to get stressed out that the most recent episode of the Big Bang Theory is going to be spoiled because they can't watch it immediately, I might advise that one take a :chill:
Yeah, I'll agree with that. If you care that much about the episode being spoiled, don't read the comments. And don't get involved in the conversation about the show.

I've accidentally run across spoilers I'd rather not have seen before seeing the show, but I still enjoy the show. It's not like I let spoilers ruin everything!!! :crazy: for me. :P

And, yeah, the RTD-Steven Moffat spoiler thing is a bit weird. Hello? You both worked on the same show at the time you were concerned about spoilers!
"The Cheat is GROUNDED! We had that lightswitch installed for you so you could turn the lights on and off, not so you could throw lightswitch raves!"
***************************************
- I'm always all right.
- Is all right special Time Lord code for really not all right at all?

- You're all irresponsible fools!
- The Doctor: But we're very experienced irresponsible fools.



Image


__________________________

THOOLAH member since 2005

EZBoard Survivor
User avatar
sindatur
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 6503
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 7:57 pm

Post by sindatur »

I think, for alot of folks, their Spoiler acceptance or Phobia is an age thing. Folks who grew up in the Internet age, don't know any any other way. Though, certainly there are other reasons folks want to avoid Spoilers, even if they grew up in the Internet age.

For Classic Who, yea, there isn't much to be spoiled. Leaving Companions, changing Doctors, a couple of Companions dying and a couple twists here and there. I watched Doctor Who on PBS back in the 80s, so, I watched these kinds of things Spoiler Free, and I am glad for it. Modern Doctor Who, however, there are most certainly complex Plot Arcs and Twists and turns, that absolutely are more enjoyable without Spoilers And you know what's reeeaaallllly annoying. Folks who follow every single Spoiler, and then bitch about how obvious the Plot Twists were? (IE: Who River Song really is, for instance).

I personally don't worry about Guest Stars or Villains of an episode, and yea, it is overboard, if you have read the Source Material and freak out about Spoilers for a Movie being made of it.

Finished Moreta: Dragon Lady of Pern, (the ending thrrough me for a loop, had to listen to it twice, it went by so quickly and remarkably), and quite enjoyed it. I actually. I was on a 6 hour drive yesterday, and had my Pern in the truck, and haven't burned the Doctor Who discs that are in my listening Queue, so, I started DragonsDawn. I imagine it was pretty obvious to others, but, I was surprised at the beginning of DragonsDawn to hear all the Familiar names
I Never Fail To Be Astounded By The Things We Do For Promises - Ronnie James Dio (All The Fools Sailed Away)

Remember, everytime you drag someone through the mud, you're down in the mud with them

Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass...
It's about learning to dance in the rain

Where are we going...and... WHY are we in a handbasket?

Image
User avatar
MsMary
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 7126
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 pm
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Post by MsMary »

I'm not sure what you mean when you say it's an age thing. Are you saying older people are more tolerant of spoilers? Cause that's another generalization I haven't found to be true.

Personally, I like to avoid spoilers, if possible, and I'm pretty old. ;)

And to be honest, I don't understand what you mean that there's not much to be spoiled for Classic Doctor Who. For someone who is just digging into Classic Who, there is still plenty that could be spoiled.

Maybe if you were watching it when it first came out, there wasn't as much opportunity for spoilers to be spread around, but that's not the same thing as saying there wasn't much to be spoiled.
"The Cheat is GROUNDED! We had that lightswitch installed for you so you could turn the lights on and off, not so you could throw lightswitch raves!"
***************************************
- I'm always all right.
- Is all right special Time Lord code for really not all right at all?

- You're all irresponsible fools!
- The Doctor: But we're very experienced irresponsible fools.



Image


__________________________

THOOLAH member since 2005

EZBoard Survivor
User avatar
sindatur
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 6503
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 7:57 pm

Post by sindatur »

MsMary wrote:I'm not sure what you mean when you say it's an age thing. Are you saying older people are more tolerant of spoilers? Cause that's another generalization I haven't found to be true.

Personally, I like to avoid spoilers, if possible, and I'm pretty old. ;)

And to be honest, I don't understand what you mean that there's not much to be spoiled for Classic Doctor Who. For someone who is just digging into Classic Who, there is still plenty that could be spoiled.

Maybe if you were watching it when it first came out, there wasn't as much opportunity for spoilers to be spread around, but that's not the same thing as saying there wasn't much to be spoiled.
Oh, nio, you have it backwards. I'm saying younger folks who grew up on the Internet don't know living without Spoilers, so, they don't know any better, and don't appreciate letting a show unfold as it does, with only your own suppositions on what you've seen, and no daily spoilers/rumors to guide those suppositions.
I Never Fail To Be Astounded By The Things We Do For Promises - Ronnie James Dio (All The Fools Sailed Away)

Remember, everytime you drag someone through the mud, you're down in the mud with them

Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass...
It's about learning to dance in the rain

Where are we going...and... WHY are we in a handbasket?

Image
User avatar
MsMary
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 7126
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 pm
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Post by MsMary »

Ah, gotcha. You have a point.
"The Cheat is GROUNDED! We had that lightswitch installed for you so you could turn the lights on and off, not so you could throw lightswitch raves!"
***************************************
- I'm always all right.
- Is all right special Time Lord code for really not all right at all?

- You're all irresponsible fools!
- The Doctor: But we're very experienced irresponsible fools.



Image


__________________________

THOOLAH member since 2005

EZBoard Survivor
User avatar
ussusimiel
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 5346
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 12:34 am
Location: Waterford (milking cows), and sometimes still Dublin, Ireland

Post by ussusimiel »

I think that this is the most extended discussion I have seen you engage in during my time on the Watch, MsMary (you'll have added tremendously to your post-count! :lol: ). (Never saw the attraction of Who myself.)

[On Topic:] I'm currently doing a reread of Ship of Magic by Robin Hobb. I don't have the next two books so it'll be off to Amazon for me when I'm done!

u.
Tho' all the maps of blood and flesh
Are posted on the door,
There's no one who has told us yet
What Boogie Street is for.
User avatar
MsMary
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 7126
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 pm
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Post by MsMary »

ussusimiel wrote:I think that this is the most extended discussion I have seen you engage in during my time on the Watch, MsMary (you'll have added tremendously to your post-count! :lol: ).
u.
That's cause you weren't around when I had more time for this sort of stuff. :)
"The Cheat is GROUNDED! We had that lightswitch installed for you so you could turn the lights on and off, not so you could throw lightswitch raves!"
***************************************
- I'm always all right.
- Is all right special Time Lord code for really not all right at all?

- You're all irresponsible fools!
- The Doctor: But we're very experienced irresponsible fools.



Image


__________________________

THOOLAH member since 2005

EZBoard Survivor
User avatar
duke
Giantfriend
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 11:07 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by duke »

Finished Runes of the Earth in my grand re-read last night. My third time reading Runes, and I was captivated all the way through. I remember on my first read being overwhelmed at the complexity of the story, and that the story itself wasn't going in the direction I was expecting. On this latest read, knowing what happens, I sat back and really enjoyed the story as I read it. Now on to Fatal Revenant, my second time reading it. First time round I found it a much easier read than Runes... (just making general comments as this topic isn't the place to go into lots of detail).
User avatar
Menolly
A Lowly Harper
Posts: 24184
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 12:29 am
Location: Harper Hall, Fort Hold, Northern Continent, Pern...
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 15 times
Contact:

Post by Menolly »

Finished Undertow; looking forward to Scorched Earth. I am hopeful we'll stay in the Pipe Woman universe for another series after this.

I have three books on hold at the library. I'm still waiting for Cry Wolf, by Patricia Briggs, although I went ahead and finished the rest of the Mercy Thompson series to date so I could get to Night Broken. I have The Chronicles of Pern: First Fall, and the next in Gabaldon's Outlander series, The Drums of Autumn, also on hold.

We'll see which one comes in first.
Image
User avatar
Savor Dam
Will Be Herd!
Posts: 6245
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 7:02 am
Location: Pacific NorthWet
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Post by Savor Dam »

I expect there will be more in the Pipe Woman universe. The deities have more Sage advice to bestow, methinks. ;)
Love prevails.
~ Tracie Mckinney-Hammon

Change is not a process for the impatient.
~ Barbara Reinhold

Courage!
~ Dan Rather
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 62038
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Post by Avatar »

duke wrote:Finished Runes of the Earth in my grand re-read last night. My third time reading Runes, and I was captivated all the way through. I remember on my first read being overwhelmed at the complexity of the story, and that the story itself wasn't going in the direction I was expecting. On this latest read, knowing what happens, I sat back and really enjoyed the story as I read it. Now on to Fatal Revenant, my second time reading it. First time round I found it a much easier read than Runes... (just making general comments as this topic isn't the place to go into lots of detail).
Welcome to go talk about it in the last chrons forums...I just reread them all too and found them much improved by it.

--A
Post Reply

Return to “General Fantasy/Sci-Fi Discussion”