SRD responded as follows:There's a question that's been raging on the "Watch", one that your recent post to the GI further fueled, and it has to do with the Elohim's opposition to Vain's purpose. It seems clear why Findail would have been opposed to Vain's purpose (because Findail thought he would "die" in that scenario), but it's less clear as to why Vain's purpose was undesirable to the rest of the Elohim. Yet in the "What Has Gone Before" for Runes, you make it pretty clear that Covenant is silenced not really to protect the Earth from his power, but rather to make Vain's purpose inaccessible. Why would the Elohim be opposed to creating a new Staff of Law? Perhaps they preferred having Covenant's ring themselves, but was the alternative an "undesirable" result? If so, why appoint Findail and make Vain's purpose possible?
I find myself still a bit confused by this response, though, so I thought I'd float it to see what others think. Here's my problem: the Elohim must know that the Staff of Law couldn't be used to defeat Lord Foul, and that its intended purpose was rather for the healing of the Land. And it seems unlikely that they would think Covenant would attempt to eliminate Lord Foul using the Staff. So imprisoning Vain and consequently preventing the creation of the Staff would not change the outcome of the battle against Foul, but instead would negate the chance of removing the Sunbane (which wild magic most likely could not do on its own). In other words, the pressure the <i>Elohim</i> sought to bring to bear related (in my perception) to the attempt to take out Lord Foul, and that pressure would likely be unaffected by the presence of the Staff.This is another example of what I've been calling "open-ended plotting" on the part of the Elohim. Their true desire is that Linden should have and use Covenant's ring. They believe that because of her nature, her health-sense, and her commitment to healing, she could stop Lord Foul (and the Sunbane) without risking the Arch--and without bothering them. So they try to manipulate her into the position of, well, taking over for Covenant. But *just in case* that doesn't happen, they know they need to be prepared for other eventualities as well. For example, they're certainly aware that they might fail at imprisoning Vain. And if they *do* fail, an essential component of their manipulation collapses. So, very much like Lord Foul, they try to prepare for as many different scenarios as they can. If worst comes to worst, and Covenant retains his ring (and his purpose), Lord Foul and the Sunbane still have to be stopped. From their perspective, what actually happens in the story is the least desirable positive outcome.
I don't know if I'm being clear or not, but I just wanted to throw this out there.