Will the remakes never end?

The KWMdB.

Moderators: sgt.null, dANdeLION

User avatar
Montresor
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 2647
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 2:07 am

Will the remakes never end?

Post by Montresor »

"For the love of God, Montresor!"
"Yes," I said, "for the love of God!" - Edgar Allan Poe, The Cask of Amontillado.

Image
User avatar
Loredoctor
Lord
Posts: 18609
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2002 11:35 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Contact:

Post by Loredoctor »

Bitches leave.
Waddley wrote:your Highness Sir Dr. Loredoctor, PhD, Esq, the Magnificent, First of his name, Second Cousin of Dragons, White-Gold-Plate Wielder!
User avatar
Montresor
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 2647
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 2:07 am

Post by Montresor »

Sayonara, Robocop.
"For the love of God, Montresor!"
"Yes," I said, "for the love of God!" - Edgar Allan Poe, The Cask of Amontillado.

Image
User avatar
Loredoctor
Lord
Posts: 18609
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2002 11:35 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Contact:

Post by Loredoctor »

Guns! Guns! Guns! Tigers are playing to-night! I never miss a game . . .
Waddley wrote:your Highness Sir Dr. Loredoctor, PhD, Esq, the Magnificent, First of his name, Second Cousin of Dragons, White-Gold-Plate Wielder!
User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

Bitches leave.

A sequel I'm OK with (sort of). The latest wave of "re-imaginings" actually haven't been that bad. It seems we've gotten past the "spoof" trend of the late '90s (Starsky & Hutch comes to mind immediately), and serious attempts are being made at remakes.

But Robocop is a classic. Both the sequels were pretty terrible, but the original kicks ass.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
User avatar
Loredoctor
Lord
Posts: 18609
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2002 11:35 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Contact:

Post by Loredoctor »

Cail wrote:Bitches leave.
I'd buy that for a dollar!
Waddley wrote:your Highness Sir Dr. Loredoctor, PhD, Esq, the Magnificent, First of his name, Second Cousin of Dragons, White-Gold-Plate Wielder!
User avatar
Worm of Despite
Lord
Posts: 9546
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:46 pm
Location: Rome, GA
Contact:

Post by Worm of Despite »

I hear they're remaking A Clockwork Orange. :cry: :cry:
User avatar
Menolly
A Lowly Harper
Posts: 24184
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 12:29 am
Location: Harper Hall, Fort Hold, Northern Continent, Pern...
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 15 times
Contact:

Post by Menolly »

Lord Foul wrote:I hear they're remaking A Clockwork Orange. :cry: :cry:
OK...

If this is true,
now I'm displeased...
Image
User avatar
Rigel
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 2099
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:42 pm
Location: Albuquerque

Post by Rigel »

We've always had remakes. Shakespeare built his career on doing "remakes" of earlier stories. Why shouldn't the current crop of thespians do the same?
"You make me think Hell is run like a corporation."
"It's the other way around, but yes."
Obaki, Too Much Information
User avatar
Worm of Despite
Lord
Posts: 9546
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:46 pm
Location: Rome, GA
Contact:

Post by Worm of Despite »

Because they're not Shakespeare? Shakespeare improved his origin stories or made them his own. A Hollywood remake usually butchers them. Plus, his origin stories were much older than the Elizabethan Age, whereas Hollywood is remaking films less than 50 years old. Says either the industry is out of ideas or the average moviegoer's historical knowledge is pathetically limited. In another decade we'll be remaking LOTR, I guess.
User avatar
Zarathustra
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 19847
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:23 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by Zarathustra »

There is nothing wrong with reinterpreting a story for a new generation. If you believe Joseph Campbell, that's all we've been doing for 1000s of years: retelling the same basic stories. If you look at it that way, every movie is a "remake." I agree with Cail--it's only bad when you butcher the original.

And like I said elsewhere, I'm really looking forward to someone remaking the Star Wars prequels. Sometimes the original deserves to be supplanted by a remake.

There's no reason why a particular director should be the only one to leave his mark on a story. That's like saying no conductor should ever try to top the best recorded versions of Beethoven's symphonies. I'm fine with multiple interpretations.
Success will be my revenge -- DJT
User avatar
danlo
Lord
Posts: 20838
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 8:29 pm
Location: Albuquerque NM
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Post by danlo »

How is Journey to the Center of the Earth doing at the box office, and has anyone noticed it? Or was everyone watching The Dark Knight?
fall far and well Pilots!
User avatar
wayfriend
.
Posts: 20957
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Post by wayfriend »

I took my daughter to see Journey. Nine is the perfect age to go see it; she exclaimed at the end that it was awesome!!! What could I add to that?

As a movie for adults, it's lame.

As a remake, its not even a "re-imagining". Its a collection of ad-hoc 3d graphics strung together with a storyline that could be described, loosely, as a journey which goes underground, and that justified the title.
.
User avatar
dANdeLION
Lord
Posts: 23836
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 3:22 am
Location: In the jungle, the mighty jungle
Contact:

Post by dANdeLION »

Speaking of remakes, is that 'In-Laws' movie from a few years back a remake of the 70's Allen Arkin/Peter Faulk masterpiece? I refuse to watch it because I think it is and there's no way in hell you could improve the prior film.....just like the Pink Panther stuff; the originals are great, and to add insult to injury, that remake is awful! Of course, that's not stopping them from making another. :roll:
Dandelion don't tell no lies
Dandelion will make you wise
Tell me if she laughs or cries
Blow away dandelion


I'm afraid there's no denying
I'm just a dandelion
a fate I don't deserve.


High priest of THOOOTP

:hobbes: *

* This post carries Jay's seal of approval
User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

Malik23 wrote:There's no reason why a particular director should be the only one to leave his mark on a story. That's like saying no conductor should ever try to top the best recorded versions of Beethoven's symphonies. I'm fine with multiple interpretations.
Absolutely. As I've said elsewhere, I think Kaufman's Invasion of the Body Snatchers and Carpenter's The Thing are both superior to the original films.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
User avatar
The Dreaming
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 1921
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 11:16 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by The Dreaming »

Watching the Trailers at The Dark Knight I thought this exactly...

Wow, with all the "re-imaginings" I'm seeing, what else is due for one? Probably Robocop and Alien.
Image
User avatar
Montresor
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 2647
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 2:07 am

Post by Montresor »

I agree with LF.

A lot of films that come out of Hollywood lately that have achieved critical fame have been straight remakes of recent Asian Cinema. And now we have a ton of franchise remakes being churned out. Some have been quite good. There is not anything necessarily wrong with this, however, nine times out of ten the remake is quickly forgotten. For every remake of the standard of De Mille's Ben Hur, there are twenty forgettable pieces of shite like Stallone's Get Carter.

As for Robocop . . . the original is perfect. Brilliantly paced; hilariously cynical and over-the-top, but totally apt social commentary; gloriously violent; two of the most memorable cinema villains; excellent performances; great soundtrack . . . I could go on, but won't. Robocop was a triumph. Robocop 2 was barely ok, and Robocop 3 was a crime against humanity.

I hold zero hope that the remake will be even a third as good as Verhoevan's masterpiece.
Malik23 wrote: And like I said elsewhere, I'm really looking forward to someone remaking the Star Wars prequels.
Personally, I'd rather not see the artistically-dead horse of Star Wars be flogged anymore.
"For the love of God, Montresor!"
"Yes," I said, "for the love of God!" - Edgar Allan Poe, The Cask of Amontillado.

Image
User avatar
The Dreaming
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 1921
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 11:16 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by The Dreaming »

You didn't happen to see that the director attached to the project is Darren Aronofski? I think he is a genius filmmaker. (Pi, Requiem for a Dream, The Fountain)

I am very interested to see what he does with it.
Image
User avatar
Montresor
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 2647
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 2:07 am

Post by Montresor »

I did notice. He is very good, yeah. But, I doubt he'll be afforded the same freedom that Verhoevan was for the film, however.
"For the love of God, Montresor!"
"Yes," I said, "for the love of God!" - Edgar Allan Poe, The Cask of Amontillado.

Image
User avatar
Loredoctor
Lord
Posts: 18609
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2002 11:35 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Contact:

Post by Loredoctor »

Cail wrote: As I've said elsewhere, I think Kaufman's Invasion of the Body Snatchers and Carpenter's The Thing are both superior to the original films.
Well said.
Waddley wrote:your Highness Sir Dr. Loredoctor, PhD, Esq, the Magnificent, First of his name, Second Cousin of Dragons, White-Gold-Plate Wielder!
Post Reply

Return to “Flicks”