"Q" was dropped or modified to fit in with the designs to make Christ more grand and Savior figure. Their argument is due to cultural, historic, political and religious reasons the gospel writers modified portions of "Q" to fit their needs and then drove their own needs to create a grander scale Christ figure. The basic belief is that Christ was in truth just a master teacher and adopting argument styles known at that time. <<<< please note that all this is high level summary of everything the scholars of "Q" think ..there are some nuances I am dropping or not mentioning here because they take a whole book to explain their theory and rationales. I don't have that space

So forgot the DaVinci code this really drop kicks the typical Christian narrative of how Christians should think and believe in Christ.
The book I was reding was "The Lost gospel of Q" by Burton Mack
I am more receptive to these type of Christian side tracks then a "Typical" Christian. I concede the author made some interesting points and am I am open to beleive that not all sayings in Bible that are pronounced as Christs are actually Christs. But my main problem with this particular book was that the author did not approach from a scholarly method. Once he was convinced all the bread crumbs he saw of his statements he seemed determined to make a sandwich and add some potato chips just for fun. Some of his arguments boiled down to well because I think what I think i proved in chapter 3 is true...then of course what I am saying here in chapter 10 is true. That type or argumentative thinking is just a bridge too far for me.
Anyways have any of you come across these type of books and thoughts?