Page 1 of 2
Zeph was right!
Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 1:36 pm
by hierachy
Just sayin'
Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 1:37 pm
by Revan
Right...

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 1:40 pm
by hierachy
Who wants to know what DACG means?
Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 1:42 pm
by dANdeLION
Danlo's Annual Clique Gathering
Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 1:43 pm
by hierachy
dANdeLION wrote:Danlo's Annual Clique Gathering
Almost.
g = group
I bet you can guess A
Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 1:43 pm
by Revan
nearly...

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 2:08 pm
by danlo
dAN wrote:Danlo's Annual Clique Gathering
-is that the same as Elohimfest?

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 2:12 pm
by Revan
No... it's nothing against you... it's just for those annoying people who always agree with you, despite the fact that in the past they've expressed different opinions... They just seek to suck up to you... like i said.. it's nothing against you.

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 2:13 pm
by danlo
well then I disagree with anyone who agrees with me!

(A must be a
bad word!

)
Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 2:25 pm
by Revan
A = Appreciation

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 2:26 pm
by dANdeLION
Ohh, I agree with dANlo! Appreciation IS a bad, bad word!
Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 2:28 pm
by Revan
no... he thought it meant asskissing... which... if you take away the politness of the word Appreciation... he's right.

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 2:39 pm
by hierachy
No, you don't understand. dAN is agreeing with Danlo, even though "in the past they've expressed different opinions in the past", which means that you don't realize the proper amount of "in the past" to be used in a given sentence.
Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 2:41 pm
by Revan
Sorry.... my bad, me dumb.

Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 9:40 pm
by Baradakas
Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 10:17 pm
by Tselava Hierachy
It's not me, if that's what you're thinking.
Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 9:57 am
by variol son
Free At Last wrote:Who wants to know what DACG means?
So now that we all know, why did you feel the need to bring up a very sad part of Watch history? Do you feel that we are treating you the same way Zeph was apparently treated?
Sum sui generis
Vs
Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 10:05 am
by I'm Murrin
I think he's taking advantage of the confusion that now exists as to whether it was dAN or Hier who posted. In other words, I think one of them wanted the other to get blamed for this topic (but I still don't know which is which).
Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 10:35 am
by Revan
Hierachy once explained to me a thing that Zeph was in fact correct about, and regards to this site... mayhap he's refering to that...

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 12:32 pm
by dANdeLION
Murrin wrote:I think he's taking advantage of the confusion that now exists as to whether it was dAN or Hier who posted. In other words, I think one of them wanted the other to get blamed for this topic (but I still don't know which is which).
I had nothing to do with this topic. I took over Heir's account after he posted this. I don't plan on using it in this way, if at all.