Today on Jerry Springer: PHILOSOPHERS!

Free, open, general chat on any topic.

Moderator: Orlion

Post Reply
User avatar
Sevothtarte
Giantfriend
Posts: 347
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2002 4:27 pm
Location: a position or site occupied or available for occupancy or marked by some distinguishing feature

Today on Jerry Springer: PHILOSOPHERS!

Post by Sevothtarte »

Crowd: Jer-ry! Jer-ry! Jer-ry!

Jerry: Today's guests are here because they can't agree on fundamental philosophical principles. I'd like to welcome Todd to the show.

(Todd enters from backstage.)

Jerry: Hello, Todd.

Todd: Hi, Jerry.

Jerry: (reading from card) So, Todd, you're here to tell your girlfriend something. What is it?

Todd: Well, Jerry, my girlfriend Ursula and I have been going out for three years now. We did everything together. We were really inseparable. But then she discovered post-Marxist political and literary theory, and it's been nothing but fighting ever since.

Jerry: Why is that?

Todd: You see, Jerry, I'm a traditional Cartesian rationalist. I believe that the individual self, the "I" or ego is the foundation of all metaphysics. She, on the other hand, believes that the contemporary self is a socially constructed, multi-faceted subjectivity reflecting the political and economic realities of late capitalist consumerist discourse.

Crowd: Ooooohhhh!

Todd: I know! I know! Is that infantile, or what?

Jerry: So what do you want to tell her today?

Todd: I want to tell her that unless she ditches the post-modernism, we're through. I just can't go on having a relationship with a woman who doesn't believe I exist.

Jerry: Well, you're going to get your chance. Here's Ursula!

(Ursula storms onstage and charges up to Todd.)

Ursula: Patriarchal colonizer!

(She slaps him viciously. Todd leaps up, but the security guys pull them apart before things can go any further.)

Ursula: Don't listen to him! Logic is a male hysteria! Rationality equals oppression and the silencing of marginalized voices!

Todd: The classical methodology of rational dialectic is our only road to truth! Don't try to deny it!

Ursula: You and your dialectic! That's how it's been through our whole relationship, Jerry. Mindless repetition of the post-Enlightenment meta-narrative. "You have to start with radical doubt, Ursula." "Post-structuralism is just classical skeptical thought re-cast in the language of semiotics, Ursula."

Crowd: Booo! Booo!

Jerry: Well, Ursula, come on. Don't you agree that the roots of contemporary neo-Leftism simply have to be sought in Enlightenment political philosophy?

Ursula: History is the discourse of powerful centrally located voices marginalizing and de-scribing the sub-altern!

Todd: See what I have to put up with? Do you know what it's like living with someone who sees sex as a metaphoric demonstration of the anti-feminist violence implicit in the discourse of the dominant power structure? It's terrible. She just lies there and thinks of Andrea Dworkin. That's why we never do it any more.

Crowd: Wooooo!

Ursula: You liar! Why don't you tell them how you haven't been able to get it up for the past three months because you couldn't decide if your penis truly had essential Being, or was simply a manifestation of Mind?

Todd: Wait a minute! Wait a minute!

Ursula: It's true!

Jerry: Well, I don't think we're going to solve this one right away. Our next guests are Louis and Tina. And Tina has a little confession to make!

(Louis and Tina come onstage. Todd and Ursula continue bickering in the background.)

Jerry: Tina, you are ... (reads cards) ... an existentialist, is that right?

Tina: That's right, Jerry. And Louis is, too.

Jerry: And what did you want to tell Louis today?

Tina: Jerry, today I want to tell him ...

Jerry: Talk to Louis. Talk to him. (Crowd hushes.)

Tina: Louis ... I've loved you for a long time ...

Louis: I love you, too, Tina.

Tina: Louis, you know I agree with you that existence precedes essence, but ... well, I just want to tell you I've been reading Nietzsche lately, and I don't think I can agree with your egalitarian politics any more.

Crowd: Wooooo! Woooooo!

Louis: (shocked and disbelieving) Tina, this is crazy. You know that Sartre clarified all this way back in the 40s.

Tina: But he didn't take into account Nietzsche's radical critique of democratic morality, Louis. I'm sorry. I can't ignore the contradiction any longer!

Louis: You got these ideas from Victor, didn't you? Didn't you?

Tina: Don't you bring up Victor! I only turned to him when I saw you were seeing that dominatrix! I needed a real man! An Über-man!

Louis: (sobbing) I couldn't help it. It was my burden of freedom. It was too much!

Jerry: We've got someone here who might have something to add. Bring out ... Victor!

(Victor enters. He walks up to Louis and sticks a finger in his face.)

Victor: Louis, you're a classic post-Christian intellectual. Weak to the core!

Louis: (through tears) You can kiss my Marxist ass, Reactionary Boy!

Victor: Herd animal!

Louis: Lackey!

(Louis throws a chair at Victor; they lock horns and wrestle. The crowd goes wild. After a long struggle, the security guys pry them apart.)

Jerry: Okay, okay. It's time for questions from the audience. Go ahead, sir.

Audience member: Okay, this is for Tina. Tina, I just wanna know how you can call yourself an existentialist, and still agree with Nietzsche's doctrine of the Übermensch. Doesn't that imply a belief in intrinsic essences that is in direct contradiction with with the fundamental principles of existentialism?

Tina: No! No! It doesn't. We can be equal in potential, without being equal in eventual personal quality. It's a question of Becoming, not Being.

Audience member: That's just disguised essentialism! You're no existentialist!

Tina: I am so!

Audience member: You're no existentialist!

Tina: I am so an existentialist, bitch!

(Ursula stands and interjects.)

Ursula: What does it (bleep) matter? Existentialism is just a cover for late capitalist anti-feminism! Look at how Sartre treated Simone de Beauvoir!

(Women in the crowd cheer and stomp.)

Tina: (Bleep) you! Fat-ass Foucaultian ho!

Ursula: You only wish you were smart enough to understand Foucault, bitch!

Tina: You the bitch!

Ursula: No, you the bitch!

Tina: Whatever! Whatever!

Jerry: We'll be right back with a final thought! Stay with us!

(Commercial break for debt-consolidation loans, ITT Technical Institute, and Psychic Alliance Hotline.)

Jerry: Hi! Welcome back. I just want to thank all our guests for being here, and say that I hope you're able to work through your differences and find happiness, if indeed happiness can be extracted from the dismal miasma of warring primal hormonal impulses we call human relationships. (Turns to the camera) Well, we all think philosophy is just fun and games. Semiotics, deconstruction, Lacanian post-Freudian psychoanalysis, it all seems like good, clean fun. But when the heart gets involved, all our painfully acquired metaphysical insights go right out the window, and we're reduced to battling it out like rutting chimpanzees. It's not pretty. If you're in a relationship, and differences over the fundamental principles of your respective subjectivities are making things difficult, maybe it's time to move on. Find someone new, someone who will accept you and the way your laughably limited human intelligence chooses to codify and rationalize the chaos of existence. After all, in the absence of a clear, unquestionable revelation from God, that's all we're all doing anyway.
So remember: take care of yourselves -- and each other.

Announcer: Be sure to tune in next time, when KKK strippers battle it out with transvestite omnisexual porn stars! Tomorrow on Springer!
Image
User avatar
[Syl]
Unfettered One
Posts: 13021
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 12:36 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by [Syl] »

rotflmfao
because you couldn't decide if your penis truly had essential Being, or was simply a manifestation of Mind?
and
Tina: (Bleep) you! Fat-ass Foucaultian ho!
Good stuff, right there. Only problem is, it's never a philosophical brawl until someone pulls out Hegel or eastern philosophy. Personally, I love to instigate by taking my stance as a Zen Solipsist.

F&F, been by #philosophy lately? I've seen a few flamewars there that almost make this pale by comparison.
"It is not the literal past that rules us, save, possibly, in a biological sense. It is images of the past. Each new historical era mirrors itself in the picture and active mythology of its past or of a past borrowed from other cultures. It tests its sense of identity, of regress or new achievement against that past.”
-George Steiner
User avatar
Damelon
Lord
Posts: 8598
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 10:40 pm
Location: Illinois
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Post by Damelon »

Did Jerry sing The Philosophers Song?
Image

Any jackass can kick down a barn, but it takes a good carpenter to build one.

Sam Rayburn
User avatar
The Leper Fairy
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 2795
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 6:42 pm

Post by The Leper Fairy »

:LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS:
Image

Pie and Cake
User avatar
Fist and Faith
Magister Vitae
Posts: 25474
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 57 times

Post by Fist and Faith »

OMG!!!! That's unbelievable!!! :haha: :Hail: :haha: :Hail: Where did this come from??

Reminds me of the Northern Exposure episode where Chris gets his Masters degree for his interpretation of <I>Casey at the Bat</I>.

Syl, I don't get there much since I started coming here. :D :D MUCH MUCH better group of people here!!!
All lies and jest
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest
-Paul Simon

Image
User avatar
[Syl]
Unfettered One
Posts: 13021
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 12:36 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by [Syl] »

agreed.
"It is not the literal past that rules us, save, possibly, in a biological sense. It is images of the past. Each new historical era mirrors itself in the picture and active mythology of its past or of a past borrowed from other cultures. It tests its sense of identity, of regress or new achievement against that past.”
-George Steiner
User avatar
Skyweir
Lord of Light
Posts: 27132
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2002 6:27 am
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Skyweir »

ROFL!!! LOL ..

oh that was sooo funny .. and I thank the gods I wasnt drinking at the time I read that!!!

I have to agree wholeheartedly!!

:LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS: :LOLS:
ImageImageImageImage
keep smiling 😊 :D 😊

'Smoke me a kipper .. I'll be back for breakfast!'
Image

EZBoard SURVIVOR
User avatar
Sevothtarte
Giantfriend
Posts: 347
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2002 4:27 pm
Location: a position or site occupied or available for occupancy or marked by some distinguishing feature

Re: Today on Jerry Springer: PHILOSOPHERS!

Post by Sevothtarte »

Sevothtarte wrote: I just can't go on having a relationship with a woman who doesn't believe I exist.
I'm no philosopher, but I know relationships like this ...
Image
User avatar
Fist and Faith
Magister Vitae
Posts: 25474
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 57 times

Post by Fist and Faith »

:haha: :LOLS: :haha: :LOLS:

(Just reading it again.)
All lies and jest
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest
-Paul Simon

Image
User avatar
dukkha
Ramen
Posts: 77
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 3:47 am

Post by dukkha »

I'm not sure I can have a relationship with a woman who BELIEVES I exist.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion Forum”