Rogue One
Moderators: sgt.null, dANdeLION
Rogue One
Surprised that I couldn't find a thread on this.
Really loved this movie! It definitely added to the legend and told a story worth telling. The acting could be better, but I can overlook that minor complaint. I really don't have much of a fanboy complaint to make either. I'll probably go see this again while it's still in theaters.
Really loved this movie! It definitely added to the legend and told a story worth telling. The acting could be better, but I can overlook that minor complaint. I really don't have much of a fanboy complaint to make either. I'll probably go see this again while it's still in theaters.
- I'm Murrin
- Are you?
- Posts: 15840
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 1:09 pm
- Location: North East, UK
- Contact:
I liked it. It's a well made film that managed to recreate the aesthetic of the original Star Wars while bringing something new to the table, and approaching it with a different tone.
The characters were a little thin - we could have used more on Jyn's life up to the rebels finding her, for one thing. It seems like the reshoots did two things: reworked Jyn Erso's character (by removing early scenes with Saw Gerrera and completely changing the "I rebel" scene, for example) and completely changed the ending (there is a hell of a lot of footage from the trailers not used).
Grand Moff Tarkin was very distracting, as it was impossible not to notice the CGI when he was next to real actors.
The characters were a little thin - we could have used more on Jyn's life up to the rebels finding her, for one thing. It seems like the reshoots did two things: reworked Jyn Erso's character (by removing early scenes with Saw Gerrera and completely changing the "I rebel" scene, for example) and completely changed the ending (there is a hell of a lot of footage from the trailers not used).
Grand Moff Tarkin was very distracting, as it was impossible not to notice the CGI when he was next to real actors.
- Fist and Faith
- Magister Vitae
- Posts: 25472
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 57 times
I think it is a cinematic horror to start a Star Wars movie without the theme music. A big let down right out of the starting gate. Save the justifications. I literally won't read them. It's unforgivable.
Fortunately, the movie was good. It was great fun watching the pieces fall together. Realizing wi Jimmy Smits was. Seeing the door open, knowing it was going to be Leia. Seeing her ship's engines, which we first saw in the opening seconds back in 1977. It made me feel young and happy!
Fortunately, the movie was good. It was great fun watching the pieces fall together. Realizing wi Jimmy Smits was. Seeing the door open, knowing it was going to be Leia. Seeing her ship's engines, which we first saw in the opening seconds back in 1977. It made me feel young and happy!
All lies and jest
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest -Paul Simon

Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest -Paul Simon

- dANdeLION
- Lord
- Posts: 23836
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 3:22 am
- Location: In the jungle, the mighty jungle
- Contact:
I noticed that too, and understood why they did it. I'll definitely see it again. Way better than Episode 7.
PS: The Spider-man trailer gives me hope for that franchize too, thank God.
PS: The Spider-man trailer gives me hope for that franchize too, thank God.
Dandelion don't tell no lies
Dandelion will make you wise
Tell me if she laughs or cries
Blow away dandelion
I'm afraid there's no denying
I'm just a dandelion
a fate I don't deserve.
High priest of THOOOTP
*
* This post carries Jay's seal of approval
Dandelion will make you wise
Tell me if she laughs or cries
Blow away dandelion
I'm afraid there's no denying
I'm just a dandelion
a fate I don't deserve.
High priest of THOOOTP

* This post carries Jay's seal of approval
- Fist and Faith
- Magister Vitae
- Posts: 25472
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 57 times
- Cagliostro
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 9360
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:39 pm
- Location: Colorado
I liked it ok. It seemed the most human character was the frickin' droid though. And I was let down that it was pretty predictable after reading such glowing reviews. It felt like Saving Private Death Star Plans.
I did like that it never took me out of the Star Wars universe though, which was some of my complaints with several of the prequels. But overall, if I never see it again, it won't really matter to me, which after viewing Episode 7 I felt like I wanted to go back into the theater and watch it a few more times.
I did like that it never took me out of the Star Wars universe though, which was some of my complaints with several of the prequels. But overall, if I never see it again, it won't really matter to me, which after viewing Episode 7 I felt like I wanted to go back into the theater and watch it a few more times.

Life is a waste of time
Time is a waste of life
So get wasted all of the time
And you'll have the time of your life
- aTOMiC
- Lord
- Posts: 24970
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 6:48 am
- Location: Tampa, Florida
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
- Contact:
My tickets are for Saturday. I can't wait. I know I'm going to love it at first and probably at second. I say that because I had a terrific time watching the Phantom Menace the first time so we'll see. 

"If you can't tell the difference, what difference does it make?"

"There is tic and toc in atomic" - Neil Peart
- I'm Murrin
- Are you?
- Posts: 15840
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 1:09 pm
- Location: North East, UK
- Contact:
That's kind of where I was with it. I saw The Force Awakens 3 times in a week; this one I left feeling fine with just the once.Cagliostro wrote:But overall, if I never see it again, it won't really matter to me, which after viewing Episode 7 I felt like I wanted to go back into the theater and watch it a few more times.
- aTOMiC
- Lord
- Posts: 24970
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 6:48 am
- Location: Tampa, Florida
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
- Contact:
I'm Murrin wrote:That's kind of where I was with it. I saw The Force Awakens 3 times in a week; this one I left feeling fine with just the once.Cagliostro wrote:But overall, if I never see it again, it won't really matter to me, which after viewing Episode 7 I felt like I wanted to go back into the theater and watch it a few more times.
I think at least part of the reason for Rogue 1 being kind of a one off viewing compared to Episode 7 is that The Force Awakens is filled with the sense of a new beginning. There are multiple plot threads that lead to an unknown future which are worth examining over and over again for clues etc. Rogue 1 is a direct prequel to A New Hope and just about everything about it leads to a heavily tread destination.
Spoiler
Of course when you discover that pretty much every one of the principal characters die at some point during the film it does sap some of the positive emotion out of the experience where TFA is filled with forward momentum in spite of the loss of Han. Heck imagine what Star Wars would have been like if Leia, Luke, Han, Chewbacca, Lando, C-3PO, R2 died or were destroyed before the end of the story. Rogue 1 is just a different kind of film.
"If you can't tell the difference, what difference does it make?"

"There is tic and toc in atomic" - Neil Peart
I finally saw this, keeping my "seen all Star Wars films in the first-run theater" streak alive.
This was great. It was a by-God war movie that was gritty as hell and had a real ending. I loved the nods to the universe - especially the tenuous connection to Splinter of the Mind's Eye. The CGI Tarkin was a little jarring, but the uncanny valley is the uncanny valley and there's just no getting around that.
I thought this was much, much better than TFA.
This was great. It was a by-God war movie that was gritty as hell and had a real ending. I loved the nods to the universe - especially the tenuous connection to Splinter of the Mind's Eye. The CGI Tarkin was a little jarring, but the uncanny valley is the uncanny valley and there's just no getting around that.
I thought this was much, much better than TFA.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
- Zarathustra
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 19845
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:23 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
I finally saw this on Netflix. I agree with Cail's points. Great war movie. I thought it had some of the best action sequences of all the SW movies.
Maybe it looks better on TV than on the big screen, but I didn't think Tarkin was distracting at all. Sure, we could tell he was CGI, but it wasn't obvious. Though he was still close to uncanny valley, I think he actually crossed to the other side of it. At least streaming on Netflix.
But apparently I'm in the minority. And that's really strange, considering that we're about 25 years after Jurassic Park, 16 years after Final Fantasy, not to mention LOTR. Given Moore's Law and the doubling of computer power every few years, why can we not yet present a convincing simulation of a human in 2017? This wasn't even built from the ground up, it was motion capture.
I think this speaks to our expectations about technology in general, and its ability to replace humans. People were predicting the end of human actors after Final Fantasy (despite that movie's dependency on motion capture, which requires real actors). But 16 years later, we really aren't any closer to making it happen. Photo realistic CGI characters are mostly animals and aliens.
If we can't even replace the appearance of humans after decades of trying, imagine how much harder it will be to replace humans functionally. No one predicted uncanny valley. I think we're in store for lots more uncanniness as we explore the territory of the future.
Things like Data and the Holodeck may be centuries in the future, if ever. Reality may be too *real* to simulate, ever. Maybe there is something about consciousness and our phenomenological experience of reality that are inherently irreplaceable, from either the inside or the outside. I don't think computing power is the problem. Surely we have enough pixels and processors. There's something else we're missing ...
I don't think we'll ever be lost in the Matrix or interact with robots that can pass as humans. I think VR and robots will always be most useful as tools to help us do what we already do, rather than something entirely new. Augmented reality, not virtual reality will be the Next Big Thing. And robots will be our helpers, not our replacements.
Maybe it looks better on TV than on the big screen, but I didn't think Tarkin was distracting at all. Sure, we could tell he was CGI, but it wasn't obvious. Though he was still close to uncanny valley, I think he actually crossed to the other side of it. At least streaming on Netflix.
But apparently I'm in the minority. And that's really strange, considering that we're about 25 years after Jurassic Park, 16 years after Final Fantasy, not to mention LOTR. Given Moore's Law and the doubling of computer power every few years, why can we not yet present a convincing simulation of a human in 2017? This wasn't even built from the ground up, it was motion capture.
I think this speaks to our expectations about technology in general, and its ability to replace humans. People were predicting the end of human actors after Final Fantasy (despite that movie's dependency on motion capture, which requires real actors). But 16 years later, we really aren't any closer to making it happen. Photo realistic CGI characters are mostly animals and aliens.
If we can't even replace the appearance of humans after decades of trying, imagine how much harder it will be to replace humans functionally. No one predicted uncanny valley. I think we're in store for lots more uncanniness as we explore the territory of the future.
Things like Data and the Holodeck may be centuries in the future, if ever. Reality may be too *real* to simulate, ever. Maybe there is something about consciousness and our phenomenological experience of reality that are inherently irreplaceable, from either the inside or the outside. I don't think computing power is the problem. Surely we have enough pixels and processors. There's something else we're missing ...
I don't think we'll ever be lost in the Matrix or interact with robots that can pass as humans. I think VR and robots will always be most useful as tools to help us do what we already do, rather than something entirely new. Augmented reality, not virtual reality will be the Next Big Thing. And robots will be our helpers, not our replacements.
Success will be my revenge -- DJT
- Skyweir
- Lord of Light
- Posts: 27132
- Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2002 6:27 am
- Location: Australia
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 21 times
I loved Rogue One - and I thought the "cameos" were really well done ... best to date, Leiah looked convincing to me etc..
Then since I've retired I've stopped wearing glasses all the time, may have added to my appreciation *shrug* lol
I saw it twice and was glad I did - cos I better followed the timeline the second time. Frigg'n tragic stand alone story... I thought someone would survive .. but nope .. nobody
It fit into the whole SW universe really well .. my 2 cents
Then since I've retired I've stopped wearing glasses all the time, may have added to my appreciation *shrug* lol
I saw it twice and was glad I did - cos I better followed the timeline the second time. Frigg'n tragic stand alone story... I thought someone would survive .. but nope .. nobody
It fit into the whole SW universe really well .. my 2 cents




keep smiling

'Smoke me a kipper .. I'll be back for breakfast!'

EZBoard SURVIVOR
- Avatar
- Immanentizing The Eschaton
- Posts: 62038
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
- Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 32 times
- Contact:
Well, finally got around to watching this last night, and to my great surprise, it was a lot better than I expected, and I didn't hate it at all.
Ok, Tarkin looked a bit too much like Gollum, and I didn't think Leia looked great, but other than that, better than TFA by far.
I was also impressed that
Didn't think Disney had it in them.
--A
Ok, Tarkin looked a bit too much like Gollum, and I didn't think Leia looked great, but other than that, better than TFA by far.
I was also impressed that
Spoiler
they all died.
--A