Hahaha yes we do like to give things a name .. all our police operations are named .. to clearly identify them .. of course ... thats not a thing that's new here. And we always name our cyclones but not each gust of wind lol _ but we name them typical male and female as well as gender neutral names.peter wrote:Got to be part of it I'd think.
Meanwhile....
Am I the only one who thinks that the current trend to give everything a name, often quite emotive and intended to project a particular image, is becoming tiresome. In the UK every puff of wind more forceful than that required to blow the seeds of a dandelion gets it's own (female) appellation and every committee it's own particular branding. We have the NICE regulations dealing with health issues, the COBRA Committee with national emergencies and terrorism. This weekend my own local police force joined the game with the (apparently highly successful) execution of Operation Allied Wolf. This dramatic sounding exercise actually entailed half a dozen policemen with speed guns going out and targeting a particularly busy bit of local road and nicking 400 drivers a bit too keen on pressing the metal. Important work, yes - silly name, yes as well
Do we want to impose an emotive quality of the object or operation naming _ not really I dont think. What emotive value does a hurricane named Irma have? I dont know.
Is it an attempt at anthropomorphism .. it could be argued but again I dont think so.