Beware the decline of Christianity

Free discussion of anything human or divine ~ Philosophy, Religion and Spirituality

Moderator: Fist and Faith

User avatar
Wosbald
A Brainwashed Religious Flunkie
Posts: 6548
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:35 am
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by Wosbald »

+JMJ+

Cardinal likens fading Christian presence in Middle East to a sinking ship
Image


Image
Lebanese Cardinal Bechara Rai, patriarch of the Maronite Catholic Church, is pictured in a 2017 file photo speaking at the In Defense of Christians Summit in Washington. He described the shrinking presence of Christians in the Middle East as a sinking ship to leaders of the Middle East Council of Churches Sept. 18, 2020. (Credit: Jaclyn Lippelmann/Catholic Standard via CNS.)


BEIRUT — Lebanese Cardinal Bechara Rai warned that the Christian presence in the Middle East is shrinking and church leaders “are called to face the winds that blow in our homelands.”

The assessment by the patriarch of Maronite Catholics during a meeting of the Middle East Council of Churches executive committee Sept. 18 underscored the dire reality facing Christians in the tumultuous region.

“The ship threatened by strong winds and waves” that is sinking symbolizes “the witnessing church in the sea of our Middle Eastern countries troubled by the winds of conflicts and wars, political, economic, financial and livelihood crises, and the corona epidemic,” Rai said.

The cardinal also explained at the meeting he hosted at Bkerke, the Maronite patriarchate north of Beirut, that the threat “reached its climax” in Lebanon with the catastrophic double explosion in the port of Beirut Aug. 4. The disaster left nearly 200 people dead, injured another 6,000, and displaced more than 300,000 people.

He stressed that the MECC is called in such turbulent time to work with churches and their leaders, institutions and the faithful “to face the waves and winds that ravage their homelands … with stances of faith and hope.”

“We ask you, Lord, through the intercession of our Mother Virgin Mary, the star of the sea in the storm, to lead our homelands, our churches and our people to the port of safety,” Rai pleaded.

The MECC in its final statement reiterated its appeal for an end to “the destructive wars and conflicts in the Middle East, to protect human dignity, and build peace on the basis of justice and rights.”

Meeting participants expressed their “deep solidarity” with the Lebanese in the “catastrophic tragedy” they are suffering from the Beirut explosions. They called for continued “ecumenical ecclesiastical efforts with all local, regional and international partners to lift the material and psychological repercussions of this tragedy.”

They also expressed their solidarity with all those affected by the coronavirus pandemic, especially people who have lost loved ones, offered appreciation to medical and humanitarian aid teams, and assured their continued prayers for an end to the pandemic.

[…]


Image
User avatar
Skyweir
Lord of Light
Posts: 27115
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2002 6:27 am
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Skyweir »

Christianity will always and has always struggled for survival in the middle east.
ImageImageImageImage
keep smiling 😊 :D 😊

'Smoke me a kipper .. I'll be back for breakfast!'
Image

EZBoard SURVIVOR
User avatar
Wosbald
A Brainwashed Religious Flunkie
Posts: 6548
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:35 am
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by Wosbald »

+JMJ+

California’s St. Peter’s Chaldean Catholic Cathedral Vandalized by Confusing Mix of Graffiti [Video]
Image


Image


Parishioners with power washers and paint rollers worked all afternoon on Sept. 26 at Saint Peter’s Chaldean Cathedral in El Cajon, CA — covering and cleaning a confusing mix of graffiti.

Father Daniel Shaba shared video of swastikas, white power slogans, pentagrams, Black Lives Matter and Biden 2020 — all mixed together on the walls and ground.

‘It was very confusing when I saw the graffiti because it had things that didn’t have to do much with each other,� said Father Shaba.

[…]

“It’s very devastating. We’re a very small minority, Chaldean community. We fled persecution in Iraq and here we are facing it again, in a place where we thought we wouldn’t,� he said.

Word spread fast, and the response from the community came faster.

“I’m very proud of them, because we had an enormous amount of parishioners come and want to help out, see how they could help us in any way shape of form. But to also hold tight to Jesus,� Father Shabba told Currents News.

Father Shaba says the church has surveillance footage of the crime which they’ve shared with law enforcement.

They will seek justice. But they also have a message for the vandals.

“I would say to the people who did this, we will pray for you. We will pray for your conversion and repent,� said Father Shaba.


Image

Image


Image
User avatar
Wosbald
A Brainwashed Religious Flunkie
Posts: 6548
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:35 am
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by Wosbald »

+JMJ+

In new Catholic numbers, an ‘imponderable’ movement shaping history [News Analysis]
Image
Members of the isolated and impoverished Turkana people gather for Mass under an acacia tree on Dec. 8, 2017, in the Diocese of Lodwar in northern Kenya. (Credit: Crux/Andrew Gitau)


ROME — An old saying has it that “journalism is the first draft of history.� Frankly, I’ve always been a bit dubious about that claim. In my experience, and to paraphrase John Lennon, history often seems to be what happens while journalists are talking about other things.

Here’s a quote from historian Arnold J. Toynbee in his book Civilization on Trial which I try to take to heart.
The things that make good headlines are on the surface of the stream of life, and they distract us from the slower, impalpable, imponderable movements that work below the surface and penetrate to the depths. But it is really these deeper, slower movements that make history, and it is they that stand out huge in retrospect, when the sensational passing events have dwindled, in perspective, to their true proportions.
In the spirit, let’s focus here not on a sensational passing event, but let’s try to prove Toynbee wrong by pondering one of those slow, deep movements he called “imponderable.�

On Friday, the Vatican published the latest edition of the Annuario Pontificio, a big thick red volume that’s a combination between a statistical yearbook and a personal directory, as well as the Annuarium Statisticum Ecclesiae. Among other things, these books record changes in Catholic population over the past year, which allows observers to track demographic movements in the church over time.

Taking a look at the new set of numbers is instructive.

For one thing, the Annuario notes that Catholicism added 16 million new members in 2020, the latest year for which statistics are available. Granted, that meant the church did no more than keep pace with overall global population growth, but it’s still significant at a time when most western perceptions are that the church is shrinking due to the fallout from the sexual abuse crisis, various scandals at senior levels, bitter political infighting, increasing irrelevance to younger generations, and any number of other alleged failures.

For sure, if you live in western Europe or in some parts of the United States, where parishes are closing or consolidating and Mass attendance seems in free fall, those perceptions are understandable. Yet the reality is that on a global level, Catholicism enjoyed the greatest expansion in its history over the past century, more than tripling from 267 million in 1900 to 1.045 billion in 2000 and 1.36 billion today.

Consider that 16 million is more than the entire Catholic population of Canada, and the church added that number of new followers in one year alone, Today, Catholics represent a robust 17.7 percent of everyone on earth.

In other words, the dominant Catholic story today is not decline, it’s breakneck growth.

Second, it’s notable that the vast majority of this growth is outside the western sphere. The Catholic population grew in Africa and Asia in 2020, by 2.1 percent and 1.8 percent respectively. The share of the world’s Catholics who live in Africa has been climbing steadily over recent decades. Africa alone shot up from 1.9 million in 1900 to 130 million in 2000 and an estimated 236 million today, representing almost twenty percent of the global total.

Catholicism, in other words, is already a non-western religion, at least at the grassroots, and it will be increasingly more so as time wears on. By the middle of this century, three-quarters of every Catholic man, woman and child will live outside the west. Trying to understand the church exclusively through the prism of western preoccupations and priorities, therefore, is a fool’s errand, yet it continues to be how most of us in the press cover the church.

Third, the data also reveal a serious mismatch in how Catholic personnel are allocated around the world, one that’s been clear for years but continues to grow steadily worse, either by conscious choice at the leadership level or a simple lack of imagination about how to fix it.

In 2020, there were 410,219 Catholic priests in the world, with 40 percent living in Europe and just about 13 percent in North America and Australia/New Zealand, meaning that over half the world’s priests live and minister in the west at a time when more than two-thirds of its population is someplace else.

This is not, by the way, because the west is brimming with new vocations to the priesthood. Like everything else, the new vocations and seminarians these days come disproportionately from Africa and Asia, who now provide 60 percent of all seminarians worldwide.

If the church in the US tomorrow had to kick out all the Mexican, Colombian, Vietnamese, Korean, Filipino, Nigerian, Ugandan, and Congolese priests serving in American dioceses, not to mention all the religious women from those places, it might as well put a “going out of business� sign on the front door of almost every diocesan cathedral in the country.

[…]

Auguste Comte, one of the fathers of modern sociology, famously said that “demography is destiny.� What the demographic data seems to suggest right now is that the Catholic Church has much to celebrate, but also an urgent need to get its act together to ensure a more deeply global perspective and a fairer distribution of personnel.

Otherwise, the church risks finding that its destiny is one for which it’s woefully unprepared.


Image
User avatar
Wosbald
A Brainwashed Religious Flunkie
Posts: 6548
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:35 am
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by Wosbald »

+JMJ+

Michael Wear, a former Obama faith adviser, launches the Center for Christianity and Public Life [Video]
Image


Image
(Source: The Center for Christianity & Public Life)


Here is Jon Ward of Yahoo news:
At 34 years old, Michael Wear has already been a faith adviser to an American president, written two books and developed a reputation as a thoughtful and connected leader in American politics and religion.

Wear is now launching an institution that will train Christians in public life to reject culture-war fights and to emphasize the public service aspect of politics.

Most Christian political organizations argue for politicians to take a position on a few issues of particular concern. Wear’s new group, the Center for Christianity & Public Life (CCPL), will argue that leaders in politics and elsewhere should emphasize personal character and service to the least fortunate.

“For far too long the ‘right’ Christian politics has meant you hold the right position on a narrow set of issues. And you could be the worst kind of person, but as long as you had that position you could be advancing a Christian politics,� Wear said in an interview with Yahoo News. “We think that has failed the country.�



Image
Michael Wear. | Source: michaelwear.com


CCPL is launching Monday [Oct 24], having raised an initial round of $1 million, with hopes of increasing that figure to $6 million for the next three years.

While Wear wants his organization to engage in political debates over issues, the centerpiece of the organization’s first year will be a fellowship program for a dozen individuals who are already civic sector leaders but are looking to apply their Christian faith more deeply to the way they live their lives, professionally and personally.

“We anticipate that participants in this program will range from postgrads to CEOs, and include individuals from various generational, racial and ethnic backgrounds,� Wear said.

The fellowship will focus on “spiritual formation,� he said, helping the leaders think more deeply about their faith and integrate it into every aspect of their lives more fully.

“Faithfulness is either for all of life, including politics, or it just doesn’t make sense to people anymore. And it shouldn’t,� Wear said. “The answer isn’t to try to muster up some new political platform that can be used to determine who’s in and who’s out. Again, that has been the problem.�

“How do we maintain integrity with our deepest values, carry those into politics with us, and remain integrated as people?� he said.
Read the rest here.

[…]


Introducing the Center for Christianity & Public Life [YouTube: 2 min]
Image


Image
User avatar
Skyweir
Lord of Light
Posts: 27115
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2002 6:27 am
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Skyweir »

If that is so, it seems on the face of it, to be a supportable position. Kudos to Wear
ImageImageImageImage
keep smiling 😊 :D 😊

'Smoke me a kipper .. I'll be back for breakfast!'
Image

EZBoard SURVIVOR
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 62038
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Post by Avatar »

I am tempted to argue that it is not declining fast enough. ;)

--A
User avatar
Skyweir
Lord of Light
Posts: 27115
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2002 6:27 am
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Skyweir »

lol 😂 :LOL: patience grasshopper lol 😂

Enlightenment on a global scale is inevitably an individual experience ~ and that takes time.
ImageImageImageImage
keep smiling 😊 :D 😊

'Smoke me a kipper .. I'll be back for breakfast!'
Image

EZBoard SURVIVOR
User avatar
Zarathustra
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 19842
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:23 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by Zarathustra »

Wosbald wrote:
Wear is now launching an institution that will train Christians in public life to reject culture-war fights and to emphasize the public service aspect of politics.

Most Christian political organizations argue for politicians to take a position on a few issues of particular concern. Wear’s new group, the Center for Christianity & Public Life (CCPL), will argue that leaders in politics and elsewhere should emphasize personal character and service to the least fortunate.

“For far too long the ‘right’ Christian politics has meant you hold the right position on a narrow set of issues. And you could be the worst kind of person, but as long as you had that position you could be advancing a Christian politics,� Wear said in an interview with Yahoo News. “We think that has failed the country.�
In other words, it's a political group that uses religion to advance a political (Leftist) agenda--as Wos tirelessly did in the Tank, and is now doing here--rather than the other way around, i.e. voting on a few political issues in order to advance a religious agenda.

"Reject culture war fights" is just another way of telling Christians to stop fighting against issues like abortion, gay marriage, radical trans agenda, sexualizing children at school. You know, conservative issues.

Instead, "emphasize public service" and "service to the least fortunate" are another way of saying, "government entitlements, nanny state policies, social/racial justice." You know, liberal issues.

And it's insinuating that being a good person, i.e. "emphasizing personal character," is adopting the political opinion that government should be involved in "service to the least fortunate," which is why those two phrases are joined in the same sentence above.

While I don't necessarily endorse either strategy--using politics to advance religion or using religion to advance politics--at least the former (conservative) strategy is honest. Having moral beliefs and voting your conscience is simply being authentic. On the other hand, having a political goal that you guilt trip gullible religious people into believing so that your party can have more power is just sinister. Whether or not a person has good character shouldn't depend upon their view of helping the poor. Believing it should be done through charities rather than inefficient government mandates that simply create more dependency and poverty are two different pragmatic views, not two different moral/religious choices. The answer isn't decided by which one is right, but which one is more effective.

"Separation of church and state" is only important when the other guys' political party is the beneficiary of their union. If you can rebrand religion to benefit your own party, then who cares about separation? Bring on the union of Christianity and Public Life!

Sky, advocating that government solve our problems (as Wos and his article is doing) isn't "enlightenment." But at least you're using language that tentatively keeps this in the realm of The Close, if you squint hard enough.
Success will be my revenge -- DJT
User avatar
Fist and Faith
Magister Vitae
Posts: 25450
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 57 times

Post by Fist and Faith »

Not sure how I missed Wos' Wear post. I may have hit "Mark all forums read" without having noticed there was a new post. Things haven't been so busy in here that it's reasonable for me to have missed it, but it's my only guess.

Yes, it's clearly a political post. It could have been about:
The fellowship will focus on “spiritual formation,� he said, helping the leaders think more deeply about their faith and integrate it into every aspect of their lives more fully.

I don't know why anyone of any faith would not try to integrate it into every aspect of their lives more fully. Whether you are in retail, politics, or a taxi driver, I would think you would try to live your life the way your faith tells you you should live your life. Why would you adhere to that faith if you did not think it was the right way? And, sure, while discussing the idea of your faith being reflected in all aspects of your life, how a political figure might do things, and how someone might vote, could easily come up. But they would not be the point of the conversation.

But politics is the clearly the intended point of the Wear post. If I was awake, I would have deleted it. We're not turning the Close into a political forum. Since I didn't, Z's opposing viewpoint is only fair.

And now we're done. Z has the last word.
All lies and jest
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest
-Paul Simon

Image
User avatar
Wosbald
A Brainwashed Religious Flunkie
Posts: 6548
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:35 am
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by Wosbald »

+JMJ+
Fist and Faith wrote:[…]

I don't know why anyone of any faith would not try to integrate it into every aspect of their lives more fully. Whether you are in retail, politics, or a taxi driver, I would think you would try to live your life the way your faith tells you you should live your life. Why would you adhere to that faith if you did not think it was the right way? And, sure, while discussing the idea of your faith being reflected in all aspects of your life, how a political figure might do things, and how someone might vote, could easily come up. But they would not be the point of the conversation.

[…]
What about the "Whatsoever you do to the least of my brothers" thing?

To wit …
Then the King will say to those on his right, 'Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.'

Then the righteous will answer him, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?'

The King will reply, 'Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.'
But by the metric you're apparently advancing, the Righteous' actions would not be simpatico with Faith/Religion/Christianity, since they didn't even think of "spiritual formation", didn't stop in order to first form some sort of specifically "religious motivation", before they acted. And note that the King/Christ does not reply to them, "Thanx for reminding me … indeed, you didn't think Biblical, cloudy, Jesusy, Precious-Momenty kinds-of-thoughts before you addressed that injustice, so you're right. Sucks to be you."

IOW, their faith-commitments were so integrated into their identity that they didn't have any need to "bridge the yawning gulf twixt the Two Worlds of religion and politics" before they could put their faith into action.


Image
User avatar
Fist and Faith
Magister Vitae
Posts: 25450
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 57 times

Post by Fist and Faith »

Can't now. I'll read your post later.
All lies and jest
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest
-Paul Simon

Image
User avatar
Wosbald
A Brainwashed Religious Flunkie
Posts: 6548
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:35 am
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by Wosbald »

+JMJ+
Fist and Faith wrote:Can't now. I'll read your post later.
Take yer time, bro.


Image


Image
User avatar
Fist and Faith
Magister Vitae
Posts: 25450
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 57 times

Post by Fist and Faith »

I don't have any idea why you think I'm saying that. I'm saying no one should say, "I shouldn't let my faith influence my decisions when we're talking about ____." It doesn't matter what you fill in the blank with.
All lies and jest
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest
-Paul Simon

Image
User avatar
Wosbald
A Brainwashed Religious Flunkie
Posts: 6548
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:35 am
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by Wosbald »

+JMJ+
Fist and Faith wrote:I don't have any idea why you think I'm saying that. I'm saying no one should say, "I shouldn't let my faith influence my decisions when we're talking about ____." It doesn't matter what you fill in the blank with.
I know yer not saying that.

Yet, you are saying that it should've been deleted because … for no apparent reason that I can descry, other than something about "the point of the conversation." Something which reads like "Faith-then-politics is A-OK" but "Politics-then-faith is No-Can-Go" (a distinction without a difference for the integrated Catholic worldview).

But what else should the point of the convo be if it's not about Civility vs Incivility? If it's not about the choice between a measured concern for the Common Good vs a Scorched-Earth Culture-War Demonization?

Cuz my faith says that an Uncivilized War-Footing is an unfaithful stance — a prepolitical philosophico-theological position which can only translate into Injustice.
  • Civility is the condition, the sine qua non, of politics.
  • In contrast, War/Demonization is the breakdown or abeyance of politics.
None of this is partisan. Rather, its about nurturing/preserving the conditions which allow for the flourishing of political parties from the get-go.


Image


Image
User avatar
Fist and Faith
Magister Vitae
Posts: 25450
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 57 times

Post by Fist and Faith »

I suspect you descry just fine. In the Close, Faith-then-ONLY-politics is No-Can-Go. Faith-then-many-topics-one-of-which-is-politics is A-OK. Wear's stated purpose is politics. As much of the article as your post quotes uses the words "politics" or "politicians" eleven times, while no other aspect of life is mentioned. The only type of response to your post we should expect is in regards to the political goals. There could be discussion on the general principle of faith informing the choices you make in all aspects of life, but you would have to ignore the focus of the article to do that. Which isn't a reasonable expectation, and, as it turns out, is not what happened.
All lies and jest
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest
-Paul Simon

Image
User avatar
Wosbald
A Brainwashed Religious Flunkie
Posts: 6548
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:35 am
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by Wosbald »

+JMJ+
Fist and Faith wrote:I suspect you descry just fine. In the Close, Faith-then-ONLY-politics is No-Can-Go. Faith-then-many-topics-one-of-which-is-politics is A-OK. Wear's stated purpose is politics. As much of the article as your post quotes uses the words "politics" or "politicians" eleven times, while no other aspect of life is mentioned. The only type of response to your post we should expect is in regards to the political goals. There could be discussion on the general principle of faith informing the choices you make in all aspects of life, but you would have to ignore the focus of the article to do that. Which isn't a reasonable expectation, and, as it turns out, is not what happened.
Been workin' on how to say this.

You say that you "suspect" I descry just fine. But I don't. I don't understand. I'm not being obtuse.

Or to be more precise, I do understand your motivations (i.e. to keep the assholery so often characteristic of the Tank out of the Close). However, what I don't understand (or don't share) is your criteria.

For me (and for the FedGov's Johnson Amdt's condition for a Faith-group's tax-exempt status), the litmus for "undue politicality" is Partisanship. IOW, a Faith-group can inform the Nation's political discourse with the moral stakes involved in the issues, but cannot make the issues personal. They can say, for example, that a "true" Christian cannot uncritically embrace an ideology like 'ABCism', but they can't say that a "true" Christian can only vote for (or can never vote for) Candidate 'X' or Party 'Y'.

But the choice between Civility & Incivility — between the Common-Good & Culture-War Demonization, between Faithful Citizenship & Faithless Subversiveness — is not Partisan. The choice isn't between Left/Right or Lib/Con or Dem/Rep or Candidate 'A'/Candidate 'B'.

Rather, the choice is Philosophical (and/or Theological).

Now, that's not me being obtuse. That's just how I as a Catholic see things, which interestingly and tellingly, is also how our Civic culture, as exemplified in the FedGov's tax-code, has seen things.


Image


Image
User avatar
Fist and Faith
Magister Vitae
Posts: 25450
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 57 times

Post by Fist and Faith »

Not sure how I can be more clear, either. Whether a political topic is partisan or bipartisan, it is a political topic. Such a topic will, obviously, and by design, generate political responses. A topic intended to be bipartisan will not remain so. Political topics are prone to nastiness, nowhere moreso than at the Watch. That's why the Tank is gone. The Close will not be the Tank's replacement.
All lies and jest
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest
-Paul Simon

Image
User avatar
Wosbald
A Brainwashed Religious Flunkie
Posts: 6548
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:35 am
Been thanked: 4 times

Beware the decline of Christianity

Post by Wosbald »

+JMJ+

Despair over declining numbers shows lack of faith, pope tells religious
Image

Image
Pope Francis blesses a nun during an audience at the Vatican with students and staff of the Claretian Institute of the Theology of Consecrated Life in Rome, Nov. 7, 2022. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)

Vatican City — Aging or declining membership should prompt members of religious orders to ask, "What do we do?" but not to despair, Pope Francis said.

Numbers are a real challenge, but "those who get caught up in pessimism put faith aside," the pope told students and staff of the Claretian Institute of the Theology of Consecrated Life in Rome and its affiliated programs in the Philippines, India, Colombia and Nigeria.

"It is the Lord of history who sustains us and invites us to faithfulness and fruitfulness," the pope insisted Nov. 7. "He takes care of his 'remnant,' looks with mercy and benevolence on his work, and continues to send his Holy Spirit."

Francis was helping the students and staff celebrate the 50th anniversary of the institute, which specializes in theology, spirituality and canon law specifically for and regarding religious orders.

"The more we approach religious life through the Word of God and the history and the creativity of the founders," the pope said, "the more we are able to live the future with hope."

The pope, a Jesuit, told the group that "religious life is understood only by what the Spirit does in each of the people called. There are those who focus too much on the external — the structures, the activities — and lose sight of the superabundance of grace that there is in the people and the communities."

With most religious orders having elderly members, Francis also used his speech to the institute to plead with religious communities to make sure that older members are not sent off to a home where they have no contact with younger members — "this is a crime," he said.

"The young need to spend time with the elderly, talk with them and the elderly members need to be with the young," he said.


Image
Post Reply

Return to “The Close”