

I also like hearing the other words for Eden. Which I'll spell phonetically, from a distant memory: Shakari and Vor Ta Vor.
Moderator: aTOMiC
Well said, OD. I think you nailed the problem with the other Treks pretty well. Though I love them all in different ways, TOS seemed to capture the sense of wonder and adventure of space exploration in a way that would be very hard to duplicate.Old Darth wrote:Another vote for the original. The other series may have had better actors and SFX but the original is just more fun and sexier. TOS also wasn't hamstrung by the political correctness of the other series.
TOS captured the joy and wonder of exploring space. The other series made it seem like any other job - like the ones we do today.
"If you can't tell the difference, what difference does it make?"
I can understand why Nicolas Meyer decieded to return to the hand held communicators. It had a lot to do with the manner in which Star Trek I was recieved by most fans. Meyer admits that he knew almost nothing about Star Trek when he took the job. The great part is that he almost instantly got what Star Trek was about and understood what needed to be done to restore much of what was arguably wrong with the first film in regard to being faithful to the original "feel". Maybe he didn't have to go as far as he did but I understand the thought of "We gotta have Kirk flip his communicator like he use to."Matrixman wrote:Old Darth's comment about the handphasers reminds me of another thing. In ST: The Motion Picture, the Enterprise crew used wristband communicators. Makes sense: miniaturization of technology. But in ST II, for some unfathomable reason, they go back to using passé handheld communicators. That's progress?
"If you can't tell the difference, what difference does it make?"