I am not only assuming the parallel existence of multiple timelines. Certainly, they are a possibilty in a world in which timetravel itself is possibility. But they are not the only possibility.Variol Farseer wrote: .....
You are assuming the parallel existence of multiple timelines. I am not, and I don't think SRD is either. I contend that when Linden arrived in the Land, the Staff was missing because she was present 3000 years before to remove it via the caesure. And she was present because she rode the caesure back into the past.
I see no evidence at all that SRD deals in the idea of multiple timelines. Everything in Runes can be explained with a single timeline, and unless something different turns up, Occam's Razor demands that we stick with that.
.....
By SRD's own definition of The Law of Time in his world, given to us by Esmer while explaining the caesures:
time is a series of consecutive moments, with each moment "leading" to the next.SRD in Runes wrote: "Within them'" he explained,"the Law of Time, which requires that events trans-
pire in sequence, and that one action must lead to another, is severed. Within them,
every moment which has ever passed in their ambit as they move exists at once."
By this very definition, it is possible to go into the past without altering it.
For example, consider each moment is a baseball. They are all neatly arranged in a line, and all numbered, oh 1 to 3000, say. Baseball 1 is the moment the Waynhim have the Staff. Linden goes back in time (along the line of baseballs) and ends up at baseball number 1. Now what she is doing is putting more baseballs in the line. So now, the line becomes 1, 1Linden, 2Linden, 3Linden, 4Linden...10Linden(the baseball where she leaves with the Staff),2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9....3000.
Linden inserted baseballs (moments) into the line, and now those baseballs "pushed forward" all the other baseballs, but their order remains intact.
Now, based on the definition, the last moment of Linden in the past needs to generate another moment (baseball) in the line. one action must lead to another. And each of those new moments (baseballs) simply "pushes forward" all the other moments (baseballs) that already existed.
Because she used a caesure which severed the Law, the above scenario is a possibility that completely follows with SRD's Law of Time. The timeline is still intact, it is now just becoming longer. And Linden's inserted moment 1Linden can never catch up to moment 3000, therefore the present of the Land she entered will not be altered by the past into which she traveled. The alteration occurs when she returns, and not sooner.
**So in the image I inserted above, the purple line would be drawn to the left of the red line, immediately to the right of the first red moment, pushing the red line ever to the right.**
I don't subscribe to the conventional "theory" that someone from the present can go into the past to alter the present from which they came, regardless of what Bill and Ted say.
Someone came up with that idea, and it stuck. But what I described above is the way I view it. Because an act cannot be undone. Therefore it would still have occured along any timeline, and therefore also would it not affect the present to which a timetraveler returns.
That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
