Is it so unbelievable that we made God up?

Free discussion of anything human or divine ~ Philosophy, Religion and Spirituality

Moderator: Fist and Faith

User avatar
Fist and Faith
Magister Vitae
Posts: 25474
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 57 times

Post by Fist and Faith »

Some random thoughts on Xar's thoughts. Not sure how connected they are.

-I'm not sure it makes sense to even hypothesize about a universe that is like ours in all ways except for, say, the speed of light. I doubt any change could be made to c without changing the universe beyond recognition. Nor do I think black holes and super-heavy neutron stars could exist without any stars; if the laws changed so that stars couldn't exist, I assume black holes and neutron stars couldn't either. It's kind of like the question of a planet just like ours that has life just like ours, but with maybe lizards being the intelligent species. But that couldn't be, because if evolution there followed the same path close enough to have all other things the same, it couldn't have changed that one point.

-I've often wondered along similar lines as Xar. Actually, while I don't feel it's conclusive, this type of thing is one of the reasons I don't think there isn't a creator. I think what I'm about to say is a different idea than the above paragraph, so I'm not contradicting myself. (Although I may be wrong, so feel free to argue the point. :D) (Oh yeah, and this is obviously from a no-creator pov. heh) It seems possible to me that all the natural laws could have been the same as they are now, but the force of the Big Bang could have been slightly stronger. I mean, we don't know anything about the conditions the instant before the BOOM. Why did things not explode in a perfectly uniform spread? (Not sure how to word that. :lol:) Why did it happen at the exact instant it did, instead of an instant - or an eon - earlier or later? And could it have exploded with .0000000000001% more force? What I mean is, could the exact same ultimate building blocks (whatever they are. Gluons? Strings?) that the BB created have been formed, but moving away from each other .0000000000001% faster? Because if that is possible, then gravity wouldn't have been able to pull any of them together. Not even two of them. And in that case, life certainly couldn't have come about. Individual ultimate building blocks that don't interact in any way couldn't form life. (And if the explosion was that % weaker, it might have all collapsed back to the singularity before life ever came about, and would have happened by now anyway.)

-The ultimate building blocks, and all laws, could be very different from the way they are, and intelligence of some sort could have come about. And that intelligence could be having the same discussion we are now having.
All lies and jest
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest
-Paul Simon

Image
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 62038
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Post by Avatar »

I think I've lost the thread of this thread. :D.

Oh, BTW, Murrin explained what I was thinking earlier much better...I too was postulating the existence of those infinite universes, rather than their chance of being the only one.

Maybe we could re-state positions though. Xar especially, cause I'm not sure what premise he's arguing from, (although I could guess I think.)

--A
User avatar
Prebe
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 7926
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 7:19 pm
Location: People's Republic of Denmark

Post by Prebe »

So, if a guy wins the lottery, he should just stay in denial, because it is so damned improbable?
"I would have gone to the thesaurus for a more erudite word."
-Hashi Lebwohl
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 62038
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Post by Avatar »

:LOLS:

--A
User avatar
I'm Murrin
Are you?
Posts: 15840
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 1:09 pm
Location: North East, UK
Contact:

Post by I'm Murrin »

Prebe wrote:So, if a guy wins the lottery, he should just stay in denial, because it is so damned improbable?
Nah. Maybe if he wins it twice.
User avatar
Xar
Lord
Posts: 3330
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 8:41 pm
Location: Watching over the Pantheon...

Post by Xar »

Avatar wrote:Maybe we could re-state positions though. Xar especially, cause I'm not sure what premise he's arguing from, (although I could guess I think.)
I was mostly trying to fuel the discussion... since it seems everyone was discussing empirical proof (or lack thereof), I would throw in something which is likely to be something one could take as circumstantial evidence, if so inclined ;)
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 62038
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Post by Avatar »

Fair enough...to be honest, I think this thread got a bit confusing well before then though. :)

--A
User avatar
caamora
The Purifier
Posts: 2011
Joined: Thu May 23, 2002 2:57 am
Location: Southern California
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Post by caamora »

I was browsing these threads and one thought came to my mind when I saw this thread: What would muslims respond to this question?
The King has one more move.
User avatar
[Syl]
Unfettered One
Posts: 13021
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 12:36 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by [Syl] »

I think it would probably depend on the muslim.
"It is not the literal past that rules us, save, possibly, in a biological sense. It is images of the past. Each new historical era mirrors itself in the picture and active mythology of its past or of a past borrowed from other cultures. It tests its sense of identity, of regress or new achievement against that past.”
-George Steiner
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 62038
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Post by Avatar »

I think Syl is probably right. :D

--A
User avatar
Prebe
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 7926
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 7:19 pm
Location: People's Republic of Denmark

Post by Prebe »

There's a distinct possibility that Avatar and Syl are right :lol:
"I would have gone to the thesaurus for a more erudite word."
-Hashi Lebwohl
User avatar
caamora
The Purifier
Posts: 2011
Joined: Thu May 23, 2002 2:57 am
Location: Southern California
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Post by caamora »

I just ask because with what is going on about the cartoon which, by the way, is not about their God but about their prophet, I wonder how they would react to questions about the existence of Him.
The King has one more move.
User avatar
sgt.null
Jack of Odd Trades, Master of Fun
Posts: 48363
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:53 am
Location: Brazoria, Texas
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Post by sgt.null »

well Islam is a peaceful religion, right? never mind all the killing they seem to be involved with.
Lenin, Marx
Marx, Lennon
Good Dog...
User avatar
Prebe
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 7926
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 7:19 pm
Location: People's Republic of Denmark

Post by Prebe »

...and what both you Caamora, and you sgtnull seem to be fishing for is someone saying "Yes. A muslim would get very upset, and burn down an embassy or two". But if that's the "feel good, them against us" blanket response that you are looking for, neither Syl, Avatar or I will give it.

So while many muslims might react in the above way, at least as many muslims would react differently. That's why nobody will ever be able to tell any of you "How a muslim would react".
"I would have gone to the thesaurus for a more erudite word."
-Hashi Lebwohl
User avatar
caamora
The Purifier
Posts: 2011
Joined: Thu May 23, 2002 2:57 am
Location: Southern California
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Post by caamora »

Prebe said:
...and what both you Caamora, and you sgtnull seem to be fishing for is someone saying "Yes. A muslim would get very upset, and burn down an embassy or two". But if that's the "feel good, them against us" blanket response that you are looking for, neither Syl, Avatar or I will give it.
No, Prebe, that was not what I was 'fishing' for at all.
The King has one more move.
User avatar
Prebe
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 7926
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 7:19 pm
Location: People's Republic of Denmark

Post by Prebe »

Sorry caamora. What was it then?
"I would have gone to the thesaurus for a more erudite word."
-Hashi Lebwohl
User avatar
caamora
The Purifier
Posts: 2011
Joined: Thu May 23, 2002 2:57 am
Location: Southern California
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Post by caamora »

Frankly, I don't know! :)

The more I thought about it, the more your, Syl's, and sgt's posts were perfect. There is no other answer.

Sometimes I can be such a nerd!
The King has one more move.
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 62038
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Post by Avatar »

:lol: Don't worry about it.

The joy of diversity is obvious, because the answer is the same as it would be for any Christian too, or any other religion for that matter. ;)

--A
User avatar
hierachy
Lord
Posts: 4813
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 10:20 pm

Post by hierachy »

In regard to the original post, I believe that it is very possible (and indeed likely) that gods are the creation of humans.
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 62038
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Post by Avatar »

Pretty much agree. And that's not even to say that they are not real...they could well be, (afterall, what we believe to be true is true), but that doesn't mean that they weren't created by humans. ;)

--A
Post Reply

Return to “The Close”