Not bad pics at all MM. I'm a big fan of image manipulation myself. (And PsP)

--A
Moderator: Orlion
Thanks, Sorus (and Lucimay)! I'm pleased that you're pleased by themSorus wrote:Those are great, Matrixman! Where is that?
Well said MM. I agree. Nice pics indeed, all three of you.Matrixman wrote:I like the monumental quality of your Lincoln Memorial shot, Lucimay - how the girl is dwarfed by the structure. Being in B&W gives the pic a heightened sense of drama that a color photo version might otherwise obscure, imo.
LOL! Dyer Bay is like that, too. Many of my good Maine shots are from there. The intertidal zone is huge, so there's always interesting stuff between the water and the trees, the evening light is close to perfect, and a fog rolls in now and then just to make shots of the lobster boats more fun.Lucimay wrote: if i get a good shot, it's usually luck.
it's REALLY really easy to get lucky at the Acoma Pueblo near Albuquerque...
Thanks, Alynna, I've consciously tried to improve my photo compositions. But it's a little frustrating because, of course, the viewfinder on a 35mm compact doesn't show you exactly what will be in the frame, unlike an SLR camera. Yeah, it would be cool to own something more pro-level, but SLR's are still beyond my budget, so I haven't had the opportunity to practice with manual settings. I'm slowly learning about stuff like depth of field, aperture size and shutter speed through some digital photography books I bought, but it's all just theory in my head for now. I've lately been poring over web reviews of digital and film cameras, and I think I'd be happy with digitals (like the Canon Powershot series) that can be used as fully automatic point-and-shoots, but that also feature a full/partial manual mode. Not to mention they're more affordable than any digital SLR. (Though the Pentax *ist "baby" digital SLR is almost within reach.)Alynna Lis Eachann wrote: MM, your composition's pretty good. Have you considered getting a more professional camera (or do you already have one)? The depth of field I get with a camera where I can manipulate the shutter speed and focus really makes the whole exercise more fun. In all honesty, though, my best pictures in recent years have been from my digital camera (mostly because I'm terrible at exposure time and picking the right filters, but the camera does it automatically).
Have you tried the Pentax website? It's got archived manuals of older Pentax models, but don't know how much help that would be to you. A few months ago I re-discovered my sister's old Pentax automatic that she had left with me. I tried it out and it still took nice pictures, but it's a clunky sort of unit. Then last month I bought an Olympus Stylus automatic. I figured I ought to get one last 35mm automatic before stores phased them out entirely. I'm still saving up for a mid-range digital camera, but it's nice to have this small and inexpensive Olympus ($100 CAN) that I can enjoy right now.My old Pentax is on its way out, I think. I haven't had my most recent pics developed yet, but the last stuff I shot was terrible - it was partly the developer's fault, but I had a lot of stuff that was badly exposed. I'm wondering if I have a light leak somewhere, or if the shutter's catching or the timing isn't right anymore. I dunno what to think. Don't know enough about the camera.
Hey, no problem! I'm honoured that you like it. I was pleasantly surprised by how well that photo turned out. Meanwhile, I'm enjoying your black&white photos very much, Lucimay. I must try B&W someday.Lucimay wrote:wow! MM! Tree at Dusk is wonderful!!! mind if i save it for wallpaper?
Many thanks, my friend. Since the second destruction of the one forest, I had been unable to manifest until the appearance of this glorious tree.Matrixman wrote:Tree At Dusk