Bannor could kick Brinn's ass!!

Moderators: Orlion, kevinswatch
I think it would be a much closer fight.....remember in Gilden-Fire Korik was put to the test by Tull, who was the newest Bloodguard. The text says that Tull had modern skills and although Korik won the fight, Tull really pushed him to the limit. We're only talking about 1000 years or so of difference. On the other hand, Brinn would have an additional 3500 years of Haruchai combat techniques. My money's on Brinn.Creator wrote:Easy decision - BANNOR!!!
Bannor could kick Brinn's ass!![Even as the guardian!! - hmmmm - 'cept he's dead.]
Well yeah. I always saw Cail as the natural extension of Bannor.Fist and Faith wrote:Cail
Brinn's mien held the completeness to which Bannor had only aspired
His story arced similarly to Bannor's in that he realised the folly of the extremity of Haruchai extravagance after he and Cail failed to resist the song of the merewives and promptly renounced his service to Covenant and co.Beside him, even Cail appeared frangible and limited
Now that's taking 'an eye for an eye' to extremes - but that's our Brinn ! Did he not serve us well ?!Without hesitation, Brinn replied, 'Let her speak the name of a Sandgorgon'
well said, and correct. !! good post.The Vow was corrupted when the three Bloodguard were perverted by Foul. It was broken when the Bloodguard decided to end their service. Which is important, because the corruption of the vow is really a matter of opinion, but it was the Bloodguard's consensus that it was, and so they decided to end their service.
Since it came back up....Wayfriend wrote:The Vow was corrupted when the three Bloodguard were perverted by Foul. It was broken when the Bloodguard decided to end their service. Which is important, because the corruption of the vow is really a matter of opinion, but it was the Bloodguard's consensus that it was, and so they decided to end their service.