
Pantheon 2.0 - Rules and Comments Thread
Moderator: Xar
- Mistress Cathy
- <i>Haruchai</i>
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 7:32 pm
- Location: Around the world....
- Mistress Cathy
- <i>Haruchai</i>
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 7:32 pm
- Location: Around the world....
I hadn't heard there's any ETA. We'll be here when you're able to get to it, Xar. Heck, it might be a good diversion for a couple hours. But do what you need to do. Our strength and support are coming at you over the monitor. (So stand back.)
I am the self-fulfilling prophecy. Give love, and you WILL receive love. Let your every answer, your every action and reaction, your every desire, be rooted in love.
Thanks! Truth is, these last few days (and the coming week, possibly) are rather busy... we have to babysit my cousin's children, among other things, and that would be enough even with nothing else brewing. In any case, I'll get to the turn as soon as I have enough time - don't worry, I'll have it ready in a week at most, I hope.Bhakti wrote:I hadn't heard there's any ETA. We'll be here when you're able to get to it, Xar. Heck, it might be a good diversion for a couple hours. But do what you need to do. Our strength and support are coming at you over the monitor. (So stand back.)
- stonemaybe
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 4836
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:37 am
- Location: Wallowing in the Zider Zee
According to Richard Dawkins', a theist is someone who believes a supreme being created the universe and is still involved (forgiving sins and the like). A deist is someone who believes a supreme being created the universe but has just left it to get on with itself. A pantheist is someone who believes Nature is the supreme power.
What do you call someone who plays a game and then believes they are the god of water and the seas?
I made it rain today!



Aglithophile and conniptionist and spectacular moonbow beholder 16Jul11
(:/>
(:/>
I wouldn't take notice of what Richard Dawkins says.
Pantheon = A set of Gods in a certain belief, world, etc.
Pantheist = 'God is all', God is in everything and everyone.
Albert Einstein was a sort of Pantheist. Though he was a Jew, he didn't believe in a Personal God.
Einstein could be said to be a Naturalistic Pantheist which means that he though the Universe has a whole was a mystical things(something like that). Many thought that Pantheists were atheists but lots said that this was wrong, pantheists were different from Materialist, atheists, deists and so on. Spinoza put it like this:
- the unity of all that exists;
- the regularity of all that happens; and
- the identity of spirit and nature
A belief in God but he is not personal.
Pantheon = A set of Gods in a certain belief, world, etc.
Pantheist = 'God is all', God is in everything and everyone.
Albert Einstein was a sort of Pantheist. Though he was a Jew, he didn't believe in a Personal God.
Einstein could be said to be a Naturalistic Pantheist which means that he though the Universe has a whole was a mystical things(something like that). Many thought that Pantheists were atheists but lots said that this was wrong, pantheists were different from Materialist, atheists, deists and so on. Spinoza put it like this:
- the unity of all that exists;
- the regularity of all that happens; and
- the identity of spirit and nature
A belief in God but he is not personal.
DEATH IS A PREFERABLE ALTERNATIVE TO COMMUNISM!
- stonemaybe
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 4836
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:37 am
- Location: Wallowing in the Zider Zee
That's what Dawkins wrote, I just summarised it wrong!I wouldn't take notice of what Richard Dawkins says.
Pantheon = A set of Gods in a certain belief, world, etc.
Pantheist = 'God is all', God is in everything and everyone.
Albert Einstein was a sort of Pantheist. Though he was a Jew, he didn't believe in a Personal God.
Einstein could be said to be a Naturalistic Pantheist which means that he though the Universe has a whole was a mystical things(something like that). Many thought that Pantheists were atheists but lots said that this was wrong, pantheists were different from Materialist, atheists, deists and so on. Spinoza put it like this:
- the unity of all that exists;
- the regularity of all that happens; and
- the identity of spirit and nature
A belief in God but he is not personal.
Anyway, you didn't answer the question!
Aglithophile and conniptionist and spectacular moonbow beholder 16Jul11
(:/>
(:/>
- [Syl]
- Unfettered One
- Posts: 13021
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 12:36 am
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Anybody have Quee's number? Might want to call him and let him know someone's using his account. 

"It is not the literal past that rules us, save, possibly, in a biological sense. It is images of the past. Each new historical era mirrors itself in the picture and active mythology of its past or of a past borrowed from other cultures. It tests its sense of identity, of regress or new achievement against that past.”
-George Steiner
-George Steiner
- stonemaybe
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 4836
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:37 am
- Location: Wallowing in the Zider Zee
I don't really trust anything which Dawkins has to say. He is nothing more than an Atheist Zealot. He calls Christians and a belief in God deluded but Einstein, Darwin, Newton, Kant and many more great philosophers/Scientists believed in God and many great intelligent Scientists/philosophers believe in God today.... I don't think they are deluded. Many atheists turn into believers i.e. Anthony Flew. Even A.J. Ayer had a near death experience and thought he was wrong(but he did admit he was wrong about Linguistic Phenomenalism and the Verification Principle... how big of him). Dawkins is still an intelligent man, though, I just don't like people who go around rubbishing belief, etc. Mini Rant over, sorry.
In answer to your question... I don't know.
EDIT: I'll be watching MOTD in a minute... Championship is better because I get to watch Saints.
In answer to your question... I don't know.
EDIT: I'll be watching MOTD in a minute... Championship is better because I get to watch Saints.
DEATH IS A PREFERABLE ALTERNATIVE TO COMMUNISM!
- Fist and Faith
- Magister Vitae
- Posts: 25466
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 57 times
I didn't know Richard Dawkins was so sophisticated. You'd certainly never get that from Family Feud. Although he did a great job on Hogan's Heroes, and was positively brilliant at the final matches of Match Game. Still...
All lies and jest
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest -Paul Simon

Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest -Paul Simon

- Menolly
- A Lowly Harper
- Posts: 24184
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 12:29 am
- Location: Harper Hall, Fort Hold, Northern Continent, Pern...
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 15 times
- Contact:
My thoughts exactly, Fist!Fist and Faith wrote:I didn't know Richard Dawkins was so sophisticated. You'd certainly never get that from Family Feud. Although he did a great job on Hogan's Heroes, and was positively brilliant at the final matches of Match Game. Still...
Dawkins/Dawson, what's the diff?
:::I best not let Paul see this post, unless I want another lecture:::

- stonemaybe
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 4836
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:37 am
- Location: Wallowing in the Zider Zee