

--A
Moderators: Cord Hurn, Cagliostro
Yeah, but in SpecFic, anything goes.Nerem wrote:Actually, I have to disagree when it comes to 'science ficition'. In Science Ficition, you're generally suppose to get the science right, or at least belivable.
Now, if it was just 'scifi' like Star Wars is where the science doesn't actually matter one wit, then that's a different beast. Genre names are a killer, huh?
Donaldson has himself mentioned that he recognizes the problems with "Lord Foul." I believe he even said in the GI that he'd name him something different if he were writing it now. However, he had a specific reason for using such an obvious name at the time. He wanted to be explicit that he was using this character as a symbol of "absolute" evil. Unlike Tolkien, he wasn't averse to admitting the metaphorical nature of his characters (even though he's not a polemicist--go figureNerem wrote:Actually, I have to disagree when it comes to 'science ficition'. In Science Ficition, you're generally suppose to get the science right, or at least belivable.
Now, if it was just 'scifi' like Star Wars is where the science doesn't actually matter one wit, then that's a different beast. Genre names are a killer, huh?
Also, I gotta agree that Lord Kevin sounds awful - primarily because its so out of place with the rest of the Land. And then there's Hile Troy, whose name SOUNDS like it shoulda been swapped with Lord Kevin's name.
And don't get me started on 'Lord Foul'.
But that's exactly the point. He was blurring the line between the two worlds. I think the "Berek"/"Berrett" thing in TIW was part of this.Avatar wrote:To be honest, I always found Kevin a little discordant myself. And Hile Troy's name made it difficult for me to think of him as from our world. *shrug*
--A