NNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooo..................

Free, open, general chat on any topic.

Moderator: Orlion

User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

You know what? I don't think that matters. I don't want to live in a society that determines guilt by either arrest or by public opinion.

OJ may be a big, disgusting bastard, but from a criminal standpoint, he did not kill anyone.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
User avatar
emotional leper
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 4787
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 4:54 am
Location: Hell. I'm Living in Hell.

Post by emotional leper »

First of all: Was it really 13 years ago? It seems like it happened so damned recently.

Second of all: While I think OJ was guilty, I was not a member of the jury, and was exposed to evidence the jury was not.

Third of all: I wholely support the idea of Jury Nullification.
B&
User avatar
High Lord Tolkien
Excommunicated Member of THOOLAH
Posts: 7393
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:40 am
Location: Cape Cod, Mass
Been thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by High Lord Tolkien »

Cail wrote:You know what? I don't think that matters. I don't want to live in a society that determines guilt by either arrest or by public opinion.

OJ may be a big, disgusting bastard, but from a criminal standpoint, he did not kill anyone.
Seriously, did you ask several people, with out each of them knowing what the other's were typing, to each type a part of that last line because no one human could type the whole thing without dying from laughing!
It's like the Killer Joke from Monty Python.
:lol:


I know I know, you're being all "legal" about it.
Last edited by High Lord Tolkien on Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
https://thoolah.blogspot.com/

[Defeated by a gizmo from Batman's utility belt]
Joker: I swear by all that's funny never to be taken in by that unconstitutional device again!


Image Image Image Image
User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

It's an acquired skill.... :lol:

Do I think he did it? Absolutely. But a very long and expensive prosecution was unable to convict him in a court of law. That makes him not guilty.

And even if they had found him guilty, it still wouldn't justify the police blacklisting him.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
User avatar
Zahir
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 1304
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 11:52 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by Zahir »

Legally, OJ Simpson is in an odd position because a criminal trial found him "Not Guilty" of the act for which a civil court found him "Responsible."

For what it is worth, I agree that the police should not play favorites.

On a personal note, he has managed to convince me of his actual guilt and my hope is that he goes away.
"O let my name be in the Book of Love!
It be there, I care not of the other great book Above.
Strike it out! Or, write it in anew. But
Let my name be in the Book of Love!" --Omar Khayam
User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

Trouble is, a civil court finding does absolutely nothing to his legal status. A reasonable argument can be made that the civil jury was pissed over the criminal verdict and ignored the evidence simply to return a "responsible" verdict.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
User avatar
dlbpharmd
Lord
Posts: 14462
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 9:27 am
Been thanked: 2 times

Post by dlbpharmd »

Cail wrote:Trouble is, a civil court finding does absolutely nothing to his legal status. A reasonable argument can be made that the civil jury was pissed over the criminal verdict and ignored the evidence simply to return a "responsible" verdict.
If you want to be completely honest about it, a verdict of "not guilty" in a criminal court should prevent any civil proceedings altogether.
User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

dlbpharmd wrote:
Cail wrote:Trouble is, a civil court finding does absolutely nothing to his legal status. A reasonable argument can be made that the civil jury was pissed over the criminal verdict and ignored the evidence simply to return a "responsible" verdict.
If you want to be completely honest about it, a verdict of "not guilty" in a criminal court should prevent any civil proceedings altogether.
Oh absolutely. The fact that a jury acquitted him in criminal court and yet he was found responsible for their deaths in civil court is absolutely ridiculous.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
Ki
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 2876
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 5:51 pm

Post by Ki »

dlbpharmd wrote:
Cail wrote:Trouble is, a civil court finding does absolutely nothing to his legal status. A reasonable argument can be made that the civil jury was pissed over the criminal verdict and ignored the evidence simply to return a "responsible" verdict.
If you want to be completely honest about it, a verdict of "not guilty" in a criminal court should prevent any civil proceedings altogether.
i've often wondered why that is allowed.
User avatar
High Lord Tolkien
Excommunicated Member of THOOLAH
Posts: 7393
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:40 am
Location: Cape Cod, Mass
Been thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by High Lord Tolkien »

KiGirl wrote:
dlbpharmd wrote:
Cail wrote:Trouble is, a civil court finding does absolutely nothing to his legal status. A reasonable argument can be made that the civil jury was pissed over the criminal verdict and ignored the evidence simply to return a "responsible" verdict.
If you want to be completely honest about it, a verdict of "not guilty" in a criminal court should prevent any civil proceedings altogether.
i've often wondered why that is allowed.
Isn't one "guilt" and the other "responsible".
So you can be one but not always the other.
Plus civil court is the only way you can sue for damages.

But keep in mind, all I know about court is what I learned from OJ!
https://thoolah.blogspot.com/

[Defeated by a gizmo from Batman's utility belt]
Joker: I swear by all that's funny never to be taken in by that unconstitutional device again!


Image Image Image Image
User avatar
emotional leper
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 4787
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 4:54 am
Location: Hell. I'm Living in Hell.

Post by emotional leper »

High Lord Tolkien wrote:
KiGirl wrote:
dlbpharmd wrote: If you want to be completely honest about it, a verdict of "not guilty" in a criminal court should prevent any civil proceedings altogether.
i've often wondered why that is allowed.
Isn't one "guilt" and the other "responsible".
So you can be one but not always the other.
Plus civil court is the only way you can sue for damages.

But keep in mind, all I know about court is what I learned from OJ!
I think it's also a difference between "Beyond a shadow of a doubt" and "Anything Else."
B&
Ki
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 2876
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 5:51 pm

Post by Ki »

oh. ok. thanks. :)
User avatar
aliantha
blueberries on steroids
Posts: 17865
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2002 7:50 pm
Location: NOT opening up a restaurant in Santa Fe

Post by aliantha »

Emotional Leper wrote:I think it's also a difference between "Beyond a shadow of a doubt" and "Anything Else."
That's exactly it. A criminal conviction requires a higher standard of proof -- "beyond the shadow of a doubt". A civil conviction requires only "the preponderance of the evidence".
Image
Image

EZ Board Survivor

"Dreaming isn't good for you unless you do the things it tells you to." -- Three Dog Night (via the GI)

https://www.hearth-myth.com/
User avatar
sgt.null
Jack of Odd Trades, Master of Fun
Posts: 48430
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:53 am
Location: Brazoria, Texas
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Post by sgt.null »

judge Ito should have nullified the juries verdict in the murder case.
Lenin, Marx
Marx, Lennon
Good Dog...
User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

That would have been even more controversial.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
User avatar
sgt.null
Jack of Odd Trades, Master of Fun
Posts: 48430
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:53 am
Location: Brazoria, Texas
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Post by sgt.null »

but it would have changed the nature of the argument. Ito was too much of a publicity whore to do anything though.
Lenin, Marx
Marx, Lennon
Good Dog...
User avatar
dlbpharmd
Lord
Posts: 14462
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 9:27 am
Been thanked: 2 times

Post by dlbpharmd »

sgt.null wrote:judge Ito should have nullified the juries verdict in the murder case.
Can a "not guilty" verdict be nullified?
User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

Yes, I believe it can.

Of course, by "Nullified" he may mean that the jury should agree with his POV.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 62042
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 26 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Post by Avatar »

Just 'Tank the damn topic already.... :D

--A
User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

Nahhhhhh, this is tame.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion Forum”