Well, that's between you and the court. Doesn't mean my point isn't valid, though. And don't you think that puts a little pressure on the other members of the court to elect you as master of the court, or maybe defer to your judgment on issues? Not that that would swing things by themselves, but... I can easily see that leading to conflicts of interest, especially when the interests of you or your court may change. I'm not saying you would, but what if you decided to take your ball and go home? With something like an alliance, that's a risk you can take, as alliances are easy enough to dissolve. But when it's an actual part of the game...Menolly wrote:I still like learning how to admin a phpBB based forum, even if my decisions are criticised by those outside of the Sunrise Court. I have yet to hear a cristicism within the Sunrise Court, although I have been awaiting them.Syl wrote:
As an outsider, I'd also like to point out that I think it's a bit unfair for any single player to "own" a court forum. After all, what if you quit the court or get kicked out? In that light, Balon's course of action appears to be the proper one. All the more reason to have official, KW-based court forums.
All I'm saying is think about it.