Hybridisation to prove a point

Post by **CovenantJr** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:41 pm

Removed

Post by **CovenantJr** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 5:51 pm

CovenantJr wrote:...I'm not going to share his criticisms (or mine) at this juncture. I want to find out what yours are.

The number of views indicates people are reading this, but evidently no-one's willing to comment. I might move it to the writers' forum instead.

Post by **sgt.null** » Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:34 am

cov jr. i have started reading. don't move as i will comment when i have more time to do it justice.

Post by **CovenantJr** » Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:30 pm

Thanks Sgt. I've restored a couple of italicised bits that I just realised were lost in the transfer from MS Word.

I think I'm going to also post this in the Writers' Circle, so when you feel up to commenting, feel free to do it in whichever thread you prefer.

Post by **hierachy** » Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:03 pm

I read it pretty much as soon as you posted it. Why didn't I reply? I didn't know what to say.

I liked it. That's all I really had to say and I found it awkward to say just that.

Post by **CovenantJr** » Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:50 am

You smell.

Post by **hierachy** » Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:16 pm

Haha, and you love it

Kevin's Watch

Kevin's Watch

Hybridisation to prove a point

Hybridisation to prove a point

Re: Hybridisation to prove a point