Kevin's Watch Religious Composition (Dec. '08)

Free discussion of anything human or divine ~ Philosophy, Religion and Spirituality

Moderator: Fist and Faith

Which would most closely define you

Christian
15
33%
Jewish
0
No votes
Atheist
11
24%
Agnostic
8
17%
Buddhist
1
2%
Hindu
0
No votes
Muslim
0
No votes
Wiccan
2
4%
Other
9
20%
 
Total votes: 46

User avatar
variol son
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 5777
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2002 1:07 pm
Location: New Zealand

Post by variol son »

Malik23 wrote:1: Strong theist. 100% possibility of God. In the words of C.G. Jung, 'I do not believe, I know"
2: Very high probability 'I cannot know for certain, but I strongly believe in God '
3: Higher than 50 per cent but not very high. Technically agnostic but leaning towards theism.
4: Exactly 50 per cent. Completely impartial agnostic.
5: Lower than 50 per cent but not very low. Technically agnostic but leaning towards atheism.
6: Very low probability, but short of zero. De facto atheist.
7: Strong atheist. 'I know there is no God, with the same conviction as Jung "knows" there is one.
I voted atheist, but on this scale I'd be about 5.5.
You do not hear, and so you cannot be redeemed.

In the name of their ancient pride and humiliation, they had made commitments with no possible outcome except bereavement.

He knew only that they had never striven to reject the boundaries of themselves.
User avatar
Vraith
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 10623
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:03 pm
Location: everywhere, all the time
Been thanked: 3 times

Post by Vraith »

I wanted to put a link here, but I didn't save it, and I forgot how I ended up finding it, but there was a page (with images) showing things you can tell from a brain scan. There were a lot of them, but the ones I recall are:
If you grew up bi- or multi-lingual (before age 7 or so, I think) it shows up.
If you practiced a musical instrument 30 min. a day starting before age 10 or so, it shows up.
If you actually believe in some kind of god or higher power (whether you SAY you do or don't is irrelevant)
it shows up...there are some strange implications/possibilities, I think, when faith shows up in physical brain structure.
J----------
[spoiler]Sig-man, Libtard, Stupid piece of shit. change your text color to brown. Mr. Reliable, bullshit-slinging liarFucker-user.[/spoiler]
the difference between evidence and sources: whether they come from the horse's mouth or a horse's ass.
"Most people are other people. Their thoughts are someone else's opinions, their lives a mimicry, their passions a quotation."
the hyperbole is a beauty...for we are then allowed to say a little more than the truth...and language is more efficient when it goes beyond reality than when it stops short of it.
Cybrweez
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 4804
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 1:26 pm
Location: Jamesburg, NJ

Post by Cybrweez »

Jeff wrote: If you actually believe in some kind of god or higher power (whether you SAY you do or don't is irrelevant)
it shows up
I don't get it. You mean I believe in a god or higher power b/c the scan tells me so, despite what I say I believe?
--Andy

"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.

I believe in the One who says there is life after this.
Now tell me how much more open can my mind be?
User avatar
rdhopeca
The Master
Posts: 2798
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:13 pm
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 12 times
Contact:

Post by rdhopeca »

Cybrweez wrote:
Jeff wrote: If you actually believe in some kind of god or higher power (whether you SAY you do or don't is irrelevant)
it shows up
I don't get it. You mean I believe in a god or higher power b/c the scan tells me so, despite what I say I believe?
Yeah, how did they go about confirming this?
Rob

"Progress is made. Be warned."
User avatar
[Syl]
Unfettered One
Posts: 13021
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 12:36 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by [Syl] »

This Time article perhaps?

And I'm a 6.
"It is not the literal past that rules us, save, possibly, in a biological sense. It is images of the past. Each new historical era mirrors itself in the picture and active mythology of its past or of a past borrowed from other cultures. It tests its sense of identity, of regress or new achievement against that past.”
-George Steiner
User avatar
Vraith
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 10623
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:03 pm
Location: everywhere, all the time
Been thanked: 3 times

Post by Vraith »

rdhopeca wrote:
Cybrweez wrote:
Jeff wrote: If you actually believe in some kind of god or higher power (whether you SAY you do or don't is irrelevant)
it shows up
I don't get it. You mean I believe in a god or higher power b/c the scan tells me so, despite what I say I believe?
Yeah, how did they go about confirming this?
I don't trust my memory completely, but the whole process involved comparing results from several kinds of tests...the scan images, EEG's (?)
and basically a "lie-detector" apparatus.
The basic point of the whole thing was that they already knew that physical things (like playing instruments, or gymnastics) and mental tasks (like language learning) caused changes in brain structure, especially if begun early, so they were trying to see if other kinds of things were identifiable as well...besides faith, morality/ethics was part of it, and some social things (lots of stuff related to various -isms, I recall)
Their sample was smallish, but I remember thinking their methods were good.
J--------
[spoiler]Sig-man, Libtard, Stupid piece of shit. change your text color to brown. Mr. Reliable, bullshit-slinging liarFucker-user.[/spoiler]
the difference between evidence and sources: whether they come from the horse's mouth or a horse's ass.
"Most people are other people. Their thoughts are someone else's opinions, their lives a mimicry, their passions a quotation."
the hyperbole is a beauty...for we are then allowed to say a little more than the truth...and language is more efficient when it goes beyond reality than when it stops short of it.
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 62038
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Post by Avatar »

The thing is, if these changes to the brain structure occur in the formative years, and the child was originally raised as a believer, those structures may have been formed before they decided that there was no god, for example.

--A
User avatar
Auleliel
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 3984
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:51 am
Location: The Phrontistery

Post by Auleliel »

On a scale from 1 to 7:

1: Strong theist. 100% possibility of God. In the words of C.G. Jung, 'I do not believe, I know"
2: Very high probability 'I cannot know for certain, but I strongly believe in God '
3: Higher than 50 per cent but not very high. Technically agnostic but leaning towards theism.
4: Exactly 50 per cent. Completely impartial agnostic.
5: Lower than 50 per cent but not very low. Technically agnostic but leaning towards atheism.
6: Very low probability, but short of zero. De facto atheist.
7: Strong atheist. 'I know there is no God, with the same conviction as Jung "knows" there is one.
I'm at about a 1.2. I believe pretty strongly in God, and am mostly Christian (raised RC). I have a lot of doubts (which I am currently exploring and working through), but none of them are about God's existence. I've had enough experiences to be pretty convinced that there is a Supreme Creator Being. But I am not a creationist (nor an evolutionist, for that matter), and I don't believe the Bible is literally true in every word (although I maintain it is spiritually true). If I find out when I die that there is no God, then I will be extremely surprised, but I do not entirely discount the possibility that this could occur, however unlikely.

My goodness this is a long post that doesn't really say much. Sorry about that.
"Persevera, per severa, per se vera." Persist through difficulties, even though it is hard.
Proud Member of THOOOTP.
Image
Buy my best friend's fantastic fantasy book! Pulse is also available here.
User avatar
Vraith
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 10623
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:03 pm
Location: everywhere, all the time
Been thanked: 3 times

Post by Vraith »

Avatar wrote:The thing is, if these changes to the brain structure occur in the formative years, and the child was originally raised as a believer, those structures may have been formed before they decided that there was no god, for example.

--A
Good point, and one I didn't think of initially, and should have. Related: if this only happens in the formative years, what about people without religious background who later believe?
Still...the results point in some interesting directions (especially since, after years of biology/medicine saying the brain doesn't grow new neurons they have now found that they do.
[spoiler]Sig-man, Libtard, Stupid piece of shit. change your text color to brown. Mr. Reliable, bullshit-slinging liarFucker-user.[/spoiler]
the difference between evidence and sources: whether they come from the horse's mouth or a horse's ass.
"Most people are other people. Their thoughts are someone else's opinions, their lives a mimicry, their passions a quotation."
the hyperbole is a beauty...for we are then allowed to say a little more than the truth...and language is more efficient when it goes beyond reality than when it stops short of it.
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 62038
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Post by Avatar »

Well, it would certainly be interesting to scan those "converts" and see if they possess similar structures. A "before and after" would be even more interesting.

I'd be even more interested to know how many people raised with no religious background do actually convert.

--A
Post Reply

Return to “The Close”