Michael Jackson
- Zarathustra
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 19644
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:23 am
No . . . I'm pretty much hoping people will forget his horrid music and remember him for dangling his own child over a deadly fall, getting children drunk and sleeping with them (which he admitted to--whether or not they had sex before they slept is debatable).Hopefully he'll be remembered for his music, not his curious lifestyle.
I really hope people don't forget how irresponsible he was simply because he sold a lot more records than his mediocre talent deserved.
And since when is not liking a musician Tank material? Can we do the same thing about people who don't like Rush (the band)?
Joe Biden … putting the Dem in dementia since (at least) 2020.
If you're so comfortable with such a rash conclusion, then that's your call. He may or may not have had dodgy intentions, but I prefer to rely on evidence rather than gut feeling. Dangling a baby over a balcony is pretty damn stupid, but that's about it, heh.Malik23 wrote:No . . . I'm pretty much hoping people will forget his horrid music and remember him for dangling his own child over a deadly fall, getting children drunk and sleeping with them (which he admitted to--whether or not they had sex before they slept is debatable).Hopefully he'll be remembered for his music, not his curious lifestyle.
I really hope people don't forget how irresponsible he was simply because he sold a lot more records than his mediocre talent deserved.
And since when is not liking a musician Tank material? Can we do the same thing about people who don't like Rush (the band)?
And music is a matter of taste, but he did write some decent material. Nothing close to the best, but that's another discussion entirely...
By a California jury - certainly not the most open minded and quick thinking group of people around. OJ, anyone?CovenantJr wrote:According to the 'accuser' (whatever his name was, I forget), Jackson entered the room naked, then left. Very poor judgement, and good grounds for suspicion. But people who were given more comprehensive evidence than us deemed it not sexual. He was fully acquitted, remember?Harbinger wrote:Innocent until proven guilty is the theory- But, as I recall, a young child described Micheal's penis in detail and the jury still found him innocent. WTF!? My children can't desribe mine in detail. You know why? I don't display it for them.
I hesitated to reply to the thread, but...
He was an artist the world loved, (and the world of art is less rich), who lived a tragic life, and had to escape into a fantasy world 24/7 to deal with the trauma of growing up. I can definitely accept it's possible that he honestly believed he was still the same as children, and honestly believed there was nothing wrong with liking little boys. (But that doesn't make his attraction to boys right)
He may never actually have molested the boys, as the court found him not guilty. However, do not forget the book(S?) of naked pictures of pre-pubescent boys in suggestive poses, that was in a hidden room, behind his bedroom closet, that was a shrine to McCauly Culkin. Possible he's not guilty of the act, but, there is reasonable doubt to be cautious. And then of course, there was Jesus Juice, that's pretty abusive to sell alcohol to children calling it Jesus Juice, especially when you espouse such a Faith in God as Michael did.
<bows back out of thread>
He was an artist the world loved, (and the world of art is less rich), who lived a tragic life, and had to escape into a fantasy world 24/7 to deal with the trauma of growing up. I can definitely accept it's possible that he honestly believed he was still the same as children, and honestly believed there was nothing wrong with liking little boys. (But that doesn't make his attraction to boys right)
He may never actually have molested the boys, as the court found him not guilty. However, do not forget the book(S?) of naked pictures of pre-pubescent boys in suggestive poses, that was in a hidden room, behind his bedroom closet, that was a shrine to McCauly Culkin. Possible he's not guilty of the act, but, there is reasonable doubt to be cautious. And then of course, there was Jesus Juice, that's pretty abusive to sell alcohol to children calling it Jesus Juice, especially when you espouse such a Faith in God as Michael did.
<bows back out of thread>
- aliantha
- blueberries on steroids
- Posts: 17865
- Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2002 7:50 pm
- Location: NOT opening up a restaurant in Santa Fe
Feel free.Malik23 wrote:And since when is not liking a musician Tank material? Can we do the same thing about people who don't like Rush (the band)?
I split these posts from a topic in GenDisc at the suggestion of a couple of folks there. The suggestion seemed to have merit: it's a topical, um, topic, and the discussion seemed to be getting contentious. And it looks like it'll continue to be news for awhile -- I saw earlier today that some folks around Michael Jackson have been worried for awhile about his ready access to prescription meds.
That said, I positively don't care what y'all do with this thread. Feel free to move it somewhere else.
EZ Board Survivor
"Dreaming isn't good for you unless you do the things it tells you to." -- Three Dog Night (via the GI)
https://www.hearth-myth.com/
Yeah, but in the court of public opinion, where all known(and perhaps, unknown) evidence is weighed, that's a different story.benzss wrote:Malik23 wrote:No . . . I'm pretty much hoping people will forget his horrid music and remember him for dangling his own child over a deadly fall, getting children drunk and sleeping with them (which he admitted to--whether or not they had sex before they slept is debatable).Hopefully he'll be remembered for his music, not his curious lifestyle.
I really hope people don't forget how irresponsible he was simply because he sold a lot more records than his mediocre talent deserved.
And since when is not liking a musician Tank material? Can we do the same thing about people who don't like Rush (the band)?
If you're so comfortable with such a rash conclusion, then that's your call. He may or may not have had dodgy intentions, but I prefer to rely on evidence rather than gut feeling. Dangling a baby over a balcony is pretty damn stupid, but that's about it, heh.
And music is a matter of taste, but he did write some decent material. Nothing close to the best, but that's another discussion entirely...
- Farsailer
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 1012
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:26 pm
- Location: The Public Employee Unions' Republic of California
We won't know that particular finding for awhile, indeed maybe never, it could be kept from the public, but I'm sure the toxicological tests will reveal a high degree of prescription narcotics in his system. An attempt to escape the reality of his life instead of dealing with it like the rest of us would. I have very little sympathy for him; he wasn't someone who could man up and accept responsibility.
He wrote some good stuff back in the 70's and the 80's, but it's hard to separate out the images of all the bizarre stuff after that. Hyperbaric chamber, anyone? We can be pretty sure something happened that required a $20m settlement. Yet the sellouts of the shows he was going to do in London this year show the public capacity to forgive a lot. Could we learn from that? Perhaps...
He wrote some good stuff back in the 70's and the 80's, but it's hard to separate out the images of all the bizarre stuff after that. Hyperbaric chamber, anyone? We can be pretty sure something happened that required a $20m settlement. Yet the sellouts of the shows he was going to do in London this year show the public capacity to forgive a lot. Could we learn from that? Perhaps...
A government big enough to give you everything you want is also big enough to take everything you have.
- Loredoctor
- Lord
- Posts: 18609
- Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2002 11:35 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria
- Contact:
Now that's interesting . . .Farsailer wrote:Some questionable company... HERE
Waddley wrote:your Highness Sir Dr. Loredoctor, PhD, Esq, the Magnificent, First of his name, Second Cousin of Dragons, White-Gold-Plate Wielder!
- Avatar
- Immanentizing The Eschaton
- Posts: 61782
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
- Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
*shrug* Was never a fan of his music. Pretty much always suspected that he was guilty of impropriety at best, especially after he made that settlement. In the end, his life and death haven't affected me in the slightest.
History will no doubt largely remain focused on his musical career and the rest will fade away to the superficial glance.
--A
History will no doubt largely remain focused on his musical career and the rest will fade away to the superficial glance.
--A
- finn
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 4349
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 5:03 am
- Location: Maintaining an unsociable distance....
Whatever the rights and wrongs of the specifics, he was one wierd dude and a poster child for the evils of celebrity. I really wonder at attitudes towards blatant exploitation of kids, not the so called victims mothers, but Jackson's family. I mean he was screwed up way before he became Wacko Jacko, it just took the seeds a while to germinate.
As for his music I tend to be closer to Malik here, but there was a short spell around "thriller" that was very, very, good; tho' one also has to balance between the genius of the product against the genius of how it was marketed. Maybe there's a question of the need for torment and genius or indeed madness and genius to walk a parallel path, but I'm not sure it's applicable with here.
When you see young pinnacle-celebs fall off the peg, it really does beg the question and that's just those who made it: what of those who did not and are possibly even more screwed up. Kids in those beauty pageants and parents who push kids through hell to be top gymnasts or into other pursuits they themselves could never find fulfillment in.
I did not admire Michael Jackson, I pitied him!
As for his music I tend to be closer to Malik here, but there was a short spell around "thriller" that was very, very, good; tho' one also has to balance between the genius of the product against the genius of how it was marketed. Maybe there's a question of the need for torment and genius or indeed madness and genius to walk a parallel path, but I'm not sure it's applicable with here.
When you see young pinnacle-celebs fall off the peg, it really does beg the question and that's just those who made it: what of those who did not and are possibly even more screwed up. Kids in those beauty pageants and parents who push kids through hell to be top gymnasts or into other pursuits they themselves could never find fulfillment in.
I did not admire Michael Jackson, I pitied him!
"Winston, if you were my husband I'd give you poison" ................ "Madam, if you were my wife I would drink it!"
"Terrorism is war by the poor, and war is terrorism by the rich"
"A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well."
"The opposite of pro-life isn't pro-death. Y'know?"
"What if the Hokey Cokey really is what its all about?"
"Terrorism is war by the poor, and war is terrorism by the rich"
"A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well."
"The opposite of pro-life isn't pro-death. Y'know?"
"What if the Hokey Cokey really is what its all about?"
- Prebe
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 7926
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 7:19 pm
- Location: People's Republic of Denmark
Meh. I personally think he was a fruitcake with a warped mind, but that's my personal opinion.
According to the jury they do apparently. Much like OJ.Cail wrote:Michael Jackson paid eight figures.....that's between 10 and 100 million dollars to settle his child molestation lawsuit. F*ck him, innocent people don't do that.
"I would have gone to the thesaurus for a more erudite word."
-Hashi Lebwohl
-Hashi Lebwohl
Not even close to the same thing. OJ was found not guilty in his criminal trial, then found responsible in the civil trial. MJ paid of the kid's parents to prevent them from pressing charges...So there was no criminal or civil trial.Prebe wrote:Meh. I personally think he was a fruitcake with a warped mind, but that's my personal opinion.According to the jury they do apparently. Much like OJ.Cail wrote:Michael Jackson paid eight figures.....that's between 10 and 100 million dollars to settle his child molestation lawsuit. F*ck him, innocent people don't do that.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
The first time, anyway. The mere fact there was a second time, and he kept sleeping with boys after the $20 million payout says all one needs to know.Cail wrote:Not even close to the same thing. OJ was found not guilty in his criminal trial, then found responsible in the civil trial. MJ paid of the kid's parents to prevent them from pressing charges...So there was no criminal or civil trial.Prebe wrote:Meh. I personally think he was a fruitcake with a warped mind, but that's my personal opinion.According to the jury they do apparently. Much like OJ.Cail wrote:Michael Jackson paid eight figures.....that's between 10 and 100 million dollars to settle his child molestation lawsuit. F*ck him, innocent people don't do that.
- Zarathustra
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 19644
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:23 am
I agree. I think we're going to learn a lot.Dromond wrote:This is just a hunch and prediction, but here it is:
I believe he was paying people to be quiet, he was being blackmailed... now that he's dead, the money may dry up and we're gonna see videos and or other solid proof emerge of what really happened in Never Neverland.
I saw an old (early 90s) interview with Latoya (sp?) Jackson by Geraldo Rivera where she seemed horrified by the little boys MJ was spending time with, alone, locked in his room for weeks at a time. They wouldn't come out to eat, or anything. Had food delivered to them. That was his sister saying this, not some tabloid rumor. I think there is already a lot of info out there that people have simply forgotten about.
Joe Biden … putting the Dem in dementia since (at least) 2020.