Personally, I thought the CGI Hulk showed a greater range of emotion than Bana did.CovenantJr wrote:I don't know, I thought Eric Bana did a good job of being angry.dANdeLION wrote:she is the best actor in the thing![]()
Seriously though, he did.

Moderators: sgt.null, dANdeLION, aTOMiC
Personally, I thought the CGI Hulk showed a greater range of emotion than Bana did.CovenantJr wrote:I don't know, I thought Eric Bana did a good job of being angry.dANdeLION wrote:she is the best actor in the thing![]()
Seriously though, he did.
There was an episode in the cartoon Jimmy Neutron where Jimmy was the Hulk that held my interest more than the Hulk movie.dANdeLION wrote:
Personally, I thought the CGI Hulk showed a greater range of emotion than Bana did.
Maybe you two should get a room.CovenantJr wrote:As for Bana, I just like him, so maybe I'm biased.
Well, it sort of is like the Hulk comic, as they've been exploring Banner's various psychoses since Peter David started writing for the book in the late '80's. Unfortunately, the film wasn't able to strike balance between self-exploration and cool, action-filled battle scenes that the book has. I think Banner's Dad/Absorbing Man/Zaxx character is perfect example of a film trying to do too much.Wayfriend wrote:I liked Lee's Hulk movie. It's dark and artistic and it explores stuff about being human. It's a wonderful melancholy Hulk.
The problem is, this isn't what a superhero movie is supposed to be.
sgt.null wrote:
why?
Yes, she did.sgt.null wrote:i thought Betty Ross died?
sgt.null wrote:i had no idea Thundra had sex with the Hulk.
As a name, for sure. As a character, he's a new-and-improved Abomination, part of several new-and-improved Hulk-type characters, which makes me feel like Marvel has run out of ideas for the Hulk/Bruce Banner character.sgt.null wrote:A-Bomb is just stupid.
Yes, he did. More than once, IIRC.sgt.null wrote:i thought maybe Thunderbolt had died as well.