wayfriend wrote:Linna Heartlistener wrote:Anyone else around here love reading Modesitt?
I read a number of the Recluce series ... sort of liked it, but not enough to follow through. He's an interesting talent, reminds me of Gene Wolf, in the way he dumps you in situations and then fills you in afterward what happened. Definitely intelligent and articulate, but the Recluce series seemed to be missing a compelling over-arching story.
Hmm, interesting point.
It sounds like his particular worldview is atheistic, and
I think that he would assume there wouldn't
have to be as deep of a historical timeline, goal, or escatology, to world events.
Is that what you were thinking of wf, or did you mean something else?
Intelligent and articulate? YES. He is SUCH a nerd, and every few years I realize I'm only beginnning to understand what on earth he's talking about on a deeper level.
Like, this year I discovered that a big component of his "magic system" is (probably) based on the people's ability with the kinesthetic sense.
Having never trained in combat myself, I didn't consciously know that there
was a kinesthetic sense, growing up.
(I should go bump the Modesitt thread and move some of this over there.)
"People without hope not only don't write novels, but what is more to the point, they don't read them.
They don't take long looks at anything, because they lack the courage.
The way to despair is to refuse to have any kind of experience, and the novel, of course, is a way to have experience."
-Flannery O'Connor
"In spite of much that militates against quietness there are people who still read books. They are the people who keep me going."
-Elisabeth Elliot, Preface, "A Chance to Die: The Life and Legacy of Amy Carmichael"