I had HopeTheFallen wrote:You can actually be saved any amount of embarrassment at this point in proceedings?
Find the simplest way to solve this....
Moderator: Vraith
- Hashi Lebwohl
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 19576
- Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:38 pm
- Fist and Faith
- Magister Vitae
- Posts: 23742
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
So, Vain, let me make sure I understand this. You were translating a riddle from Chinese. And you were so sure of your translating skills that you repeatedly assured us that you had it all correct, with nothing missing. Kinda cocky, eh?
All lies and jest
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest -Paul Simon
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest -Paul Simon
- Zarathustra
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 19644
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:23 am
- Been thanked: 1 time
- TheFallen
- Master of Innominate Surquedry
- Posts: 3157
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 3:16 pm
- Location: Guildford, UK
- Has thanked: 1 time
If you've got any mathematical skill, Z, I wish you'd weigh in on the two envelopes paradox.
Newsflash: the word "irony" doesn't mean "a bit like iron"
Shockingly, some people have claimed that I'm egocentric... but hey, enough about them
"If you strike me down, I shall become far stronger than you can possibly imagine."
_______________________________________________
I occasionally post things here because I am invariably correct on all matters, a thing which is educational for others less fortunate.
Shockingly, some people have claimed that I'm egocentric... but hey, enough about them
"If you strike me down, I shall become far stronger than you can possibly imagine."
_______________________________________________
I occasionally post things here because I am invariably correct on all matters, a thing which is educational for others less fortunate.
- wayfriend
- .
- Posts: 20957
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
If I wanted to solve this without a "formula", I would do it his way.
I would start with 15 chickens and 30 feet.
Then I would switch a chicken for a horse to get 2 more feet.
Repeat until I reach 40.
Leaves me with 10 chickens and 5 horses.
Is this the kind of answer you are looking for, Vain?
BTW, the answer has 20 chicken feet and 20 horse feet. You nailed it, Hashi - the very middle indeed.
I would start with 15 chickens and 30 feet.
Then I would switch a chicken for a horse to get 2 more feet.
Repeat until I reach 40.
Leaves me with 10 chickens and 5 horses.
Is this the kind of answer you are looking for, Vain?
BTW, the answer has 20 chicken feet and 20 horse feet. You nailed it, Hashi - the very middle indeed.
.
- TheFallen
- Master of Innominate Surquedry
- Posts: 3157
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 3:16 pm
- Location: Guildford, UK
- Has thanked: 1 time
That's completely ridiculous, WF. What a drooling slack-jawed lackwit you are.
Entirely unlike your quite preposterous proposition, what one should obviously do instead is this:-
Start with 15 horses and 60 feet.
Then switch a horse for a chicken to get 2 less feet.
Repeat until you reach 40.
Leaves you with 5 horses and 10 chickens.
It's obvious, really. Well, clearly except to the intellectually benighted.
Entirely unlike your quite preposterous proposition, what one should obviously do instead is this:-
Start with 15 horses and 60 feet.
Then switch a horse for a chicken to get 2 less feet.
Repeat until you reach 40.
Leaves you with 5 horses and 10 chickens.
It's obvious, really. Well, clearly except to the intellectually benighted.
Newsflash: the word "irony" doesn't mean "a bit like iron"
Shockingly, some people have claimed that I'm egocentric... but hey, enough about them
"If you strike me down, I shall become far stronger than you can possibly imagine."
_______________________________________________
I occasionally post things here because I am invariably correct on all matters, a thing which is educational for others less fortunate.
Shockingly, some people have claimed that I'm egocentric... but hey, enough about them
"If you strike me down, I shall become far stronger than you can possibly imagine."
_______________________________________________
I occasionally post things here because I am invariably correct on all matters, a thing which is educational for others less fortunate.
When you say it like that, I don't feel so bad no more. It was the Chinese translation that was at faultFist and Faith wrote:So, Vain, let me make sure I understand this. You were translating a riddle from Chinese. And you were so sure of your translating skills that you repeatedly assured us that you had it all correct, with nothing missing. Kinda cocky, eh?
That's a pretty cool way to solve for that WF
OK so here goes.
Stand in front of all the animals, and tell them that every time you blow a whistle, they must lift one leg.
After two blows of the whistle, all the chickens are sitting on their bums and there's only 10 legs left on the ground - and they must belong to horses.
And they have to belong to 5 horses
OK so here goes.
Stand in front of all the animals, and tell them that every time you blow a whistle, they must lift one leg.
After two blows of the whistle, all the chickens are sitting on their bums and there's only 10 legs left on the ground - and they must belong to horses.
And they have to belong to 5 horses
- TheFallen
- Master of Innominate Surquedry
- Posts: 3157
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 3:16 pm
- Location: Guildford, UK
- Has thanked: 1 time
A purely logical way to solve things, huh?
So, let's see...
1) You have to be an expert horse trainer...
2) And an expert chicken trainer...
3) Or alternatively have the communication powers of Dr. Doolittle...
4) And hope that your motley collection of animals are all feeling compliant...
5) And you have to have sourced chickens that can balance on one leg for a while without falling over or putting the other leg back down. Wouldn't flamingos have been a better choice?
6) And you have to have sourced horses that can stay rearing on their back legs for at least long enough to be counted.
I think we can draw two conclusions here:-
1. Never ask Vain for his logical opinion on anything. At all. Ever.
and...
2. Never ask Vain to order for you in a Chinese restaurant. At all. Ever.
So, let's see...
1) You have to be an expert horse trainer...
2) And an expert chicken trainer...
3) Or alternatively have the communication powers of Dr. Doolittle...
4) And hope that your motley collection of animals are all feeling compliant...
5) And you have to have sourced chickens that can balance on one leg for a while without falling over or putting the other leg back down. Wouldn't flamingos have been a better choice?
6) And you have to have sourced horses that can stay rearing on their back legs for at least long enough to be counted.
I think we can draw two conclusions here:-
1. Never ask Vain for his logical opinion on anything. At all. Ever.
and...
2. Never ask Vain to order for you in a Chinese restaurant. At all. Ever.
Newsflash: the word "irony" doesn't mean "a bit like iron"
Shockingly, some people have claimed that I'm egocentric... but hey, enough about them
"If you strike me down, I shall become far stronger than you can possibly imagine."
_______________________________________________
I occasionally post things here because I am invariably correct on all matters, a thing which is educational for others less fortunate.
Shockingly, some people have claimed that I'm egocentric... but hey, enough about them
"If you strike me down, I shall become far stronger than you can possibly imagine."
_______________________________________________
I occasionally post things here because I am invariably correct on all matters, a thing which is educational for others less fortunate.
- Vraith
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 10621
- Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:03 pm
- Location: everywhere, all the time
OTOH, chickens can stand on 1 leg practically forever if they want to.wayfriend wrote:I don't think horses can stand on two legs, Vain. At least, not for long enough to count them all!
[spoiler]Sig-man, Libtard, Stupid piece of shit. change your text color to brown. Mr. Reliable, bullshit-slinging liarFucker-user.[/spoiler]
the difference between evidence and sources: whether they come from the horse's mouth or a horse's ass.
"Most people are other people. Their thoughts are someone else's opinions, their lives a mimicry, their passions a quotation."
the hyperbole is a beauty...for we are then allowed to say a little more than the truth...and language is more efficient when it goes beyond reality than when it stops short of it.
the difference between evidence and sources: whether they come from the horse's mouth or a horse's ass.
"Most people are other people. Their thoughts are someone else's opinions, their lives a mimicry, their passions a quotation."
the hyperbole is a beauty...for we are then allowed to say a little more than the truth...and language is more efficient when it goes beyond reality than when it stops short of it.
- Zarathustra
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 19644
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:23 am
- Been thanked: 1 time
I thought you had to solve it based on the information given in the original riddle. If your solution requires you to stand in front of all the animals and look at them, can't you just count how many are chickens and how many are horses? Why do you have to count their legs at all? Isn't that the easiest way to do it?Vain wrote:That's a pretty cool way to solve for that WF
OK so here goes.
Stand in front of all the animals, and tell them that every time you blow a whistle, they must lift one leg.
After two blows of the whistle, all the chickens are sitting on their bums and there's only 10 legs left on the ground - and they must belong to horses.
And they have to belong to 5 horses
WF's solution is pretty good, but it's still an algorithmic function involving numbers. You must still use math to come up with the answer, except that the relations or steps hidden by our normal mathematical notation is made explicit by the algorithm (much like programming a computer to crunch numbers).
Joe Biden … putting the Dem in dementia since (at least) 2020.