
--A
Moderator: Orlion
Congrats!aliantha wrote:That dress is adorable, Frosty! Uh...wait...fierce. Deadly, even. Yes! The roses have razor-sharp pointy things on the petals, I'm certain of it! And the little birds will peck out your enemies' eyes in a heartbeat!
My glasses came today from Zenni Optical, and I'm very happy. Nice to be able to see again.
I had a nice birthday.
The anti-vac people generally try the tactic of convincing people that the flu shot is useless for that reason, but according to my doctor (I asked him when I last went in for shoulder problems as my wife buys into a lot of that) the flu vaccine is a best guess at what is likely to be prevalant in any particular year and in general hits the right strains.Linna Heartlistener wrote:Meh... We need to get shots this year...
also, it still wouldn't necess. be a waste for you get a flu shot.
There are many flu viruses, I understand.
Wild!StevieG wrote:I've never had one because apparently they are cultured in egg, and I used to have an egg allergy, and my doctor doesn't want to risk it. The rest of the family have them though.
Unfortunately I have a neighbor who believes her son's autism was cause by the MMR vaccine, and so she proselytizes to everyone she knows, which includes my wife. I don't buy into a single word of it, but my wife has been convinced by the flu shot one.Linna Heartlistener wrote:michaelm- well, that's just silly if the anti-immunization people get away with the tactic.
What I want to know is... how many strains are covered in a random year... now that makes me curious!
Apparently they guessed wrong this year and it take 4 months to create enough of the flu vaccine with the new strain. By then the flu season is over. So for many its better luck next year.michaelm wrote:Unfortunately I have a neighbor who believes her son's autism was cause by the MMR vaccine, and so she proselytizes to everyone she knows, which includes my wife. I don't buy into a single word of it, but my wife has been convinced by the flu shot one.Linna Heartlistener wrote:michaelm- well, that's just silly if the anti-immunization people get away with the tactic.
What I want to know is... how many strains are covered in a random year... now that makes me curious!
When I asked the doctor he said that it's simply impractical to cover all possible strains, so the shot is really a best guess based on number of cases where the strain has been identified. I don't think it's very many strains, just a few that will hopefully cover a majority of people vaccinated.
Gonna do my best to manage "couch potato" thanks. (At least, nothing more than day trips. A bit of climbing, some hiking, a few galleries / museums. Going to a Tutankhamen exhibition on Monday.)peter wrote:[edit; Av, are you going anywhere on hols? Are you 'a man witha plan' or are we talking 'couch potato' all the way here]
Love the quote about the american embassy.Russia: Plans for Moscow 'Eye of Sauron' scrapped
A Moscow creative art group has ditched plans to erect a giant glowing "Eye of Sauron" atop a city skyscraper, after complaints from church and city leaders.
The Svecheniye (Glow) group intended to install the Eye - familiar to Lord of the Rings fans - on a building in the Moscow-City business district. The metre-tall (3ft 3in) globe would have burned overnight in tribute to JRR Tolkien's fantasy works, but the plans have now been scrapped. "Sadly we are obliged to halt the Eye of Sauron," Svecheniye says in a press statement reported by RIA Novosti news agency, adding that it apologised for having "elicited such a public reaction". Although the "fan project" was meant to mark the Moscow premiere of the latest Hobbit film, it was not an advertising event, "nor did it have a religious or political subtext", the group says.
The denial of any religious intent follows criticism from the Russian Orthodox Church's public relations chief, Vsevolod Chaplin, who denounced the Eye of Sauron as a "demonic symbol of the triumph of evil" that might "bring misfortune upon the city". The Moscow mayor's office said they would almost certainly remove the Eye, as they had not granted their permission. But some social media users think the church's objections will actually prove to be counter-productive. "Now magic, sorcery and witchcraft will gain even more public attention," writes one reader of the Komsomolskaya Pravda newspaper, while another complains: "The Church thinks that it alone can put on such a mass show." One person suggests an alternative location for the Eye: "The roof of the US Embassy's the best place for it."