Nothing wrong with playing tight defense.
When we were kids, we used to play around with the pieces a lot. 3 knights and 1 bishop, advance all pieces I row at the start, different rules, etc. I think everybody does this at some level, thinking about strengths and weaknesses of the design, and I believe it's part of what's led to the game being what it is today (or games like 3-dimensional chess, and so on). Until you do this, you can't really understand the elegant simplicity and multi-faceted possibility of the game.
chess question
Moderators: Orlion, balon!, aliantha
-
[Syl]
- Unfettered One
- Posts: 13020
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 12:36 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
"It is not the literal past that rules us, save, possibly, in a biological sense. It is images of the past. Each new historical era mirrors itself in the picture and active mythology of its past or of a past borrowed from other cultures. It tests its sense of identity, of regress or new achievement against that past.”
-George Steiner
-George Steiner
-
High Lord Tolkien
- Excommunicated Member of THOOLAH
- Posts: 7385
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:40 am
- Location: Cape Cod, Mass
- Been thanked: 3 times
- Contact:
You can't win with defense unless your opponent screw up, right?
Anyone ever try those 3 or 4 player chess sets?
Looks interesting but I never tried it.
Anyone ever try those 3 or 4 player chess sets?
Looks interesting but I never tried it.
https://thoolah.blogspot.com/
[Defeated by a gizmo from Batman's utility belt]
Joker: I swear by all that's funny never to be taken in by that unconstitutional device again!
[Defeated by a gizmo from Batman's utility belt]
Joker: I swear by all that's funny never to be taken in by that unconstitutional device again!
-
[Syl]
- Unfettered One
- Posts: 13020
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 12:36 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Yeah, but tight defense tends to make your opponent screw up. Similar to poker where you can make money 95% of the time by not getting drawn into a hand where you don't have the nuts. The problem (other 5%) is when you go up against a patient but aggressive opponent.
Heh. The great thing about playing poor defensive players is making moves just to screw with them. Left- or right-side pawn skirmishes that have no value other than to annoy your opponent. Almost as much fun as that moment where your opponent realizes you've gone from defense to offense.
Heh. The great thing about playing poor defensive players is making moves just to screw with them. Left- or right-side pawn skirmishes that have no value other than to annoy your opponent. Almost as much fun as that moment where your opponent realizes you've gone from defense to offense.
"It is not the literal past that rules us, save, possibly, in a biological sense. It is images of the past. Each new historical era mirrors itself in the picture and active mythology of its past or of a past borrowed from other cultures. It tests its sense of identity, of regress or new achievement against that past.”
-George Steiner
-George Steiner
-
Obi-Wan Nihilo
- Still Not Buying It
- Posts: 5951
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 3:37 pm
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
All defensive postures being equal, it is virtually impossible to win without first obtaining the initiative.
Syl, I think your observations are somewhat misleading to a beginning player, as you undoubtedly avoid novice faux pas like creating bad bishops behind unassailable pawn walls as a matter of course.
Syl, I think your observations are somewhat misleading to a beginning player, as you undoubtedly avoid novice faux pas like creating bad bishops behind unassailable pawn walls as a matter of course.
-
[Syl]
- Unfettered One
- Posts: 13020
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 12:36 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Better a blocked bishop than a dropped queen, though, right? And a fi... beginner, playing offensively, will always bring out their queen as soon as they can. It's a law, I think. In fact, if a beginner can play offensively without trying to bring out their rooks or queen first (or maybe trying to launch the Great Pawn Offensive), I'd say they're probably not much of a beginner anymore.
Defense and offense are both part of any good chess game. You can't do one or the other. If you do, though, I would argue that a purely defensive game would yield better results, both in leading to a longer game and in turning a beginner player into an intermediate one.
Defense and offense are both part of any good chess game. You can't do one or the other. If you do, though, I would argue that a purely defensive game would yield better results, both in leading to a longer game and in turning a beginner player into an intermediate one.
"It is not the literal past that rules us, save, possibly, in a biological sense. It is images of the past. Each new historical era mirrors itself in the picture and active mythology of its past or of a past borrowed from other cultures. It tests its sense of identity, of regress or new achievement against that past.”
-George Steiner
-George Steiner
Nothing I like more than to see somebody beating themselves bloody against my defences. 
