anyone remember the griffin?
Moderators: Savor Dam, Menolly
-
- Servant of the Land
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2019 1:18 am
anyone remember the griffin?
At the battle of Soaring Woodhelivin, there was a griffin, do you remember?
If not mistaken, wasn't that the first and last flying beast in the Chronicles?
If not mistaken, wasn't that the first and last flying beast in the Chronicles?
- wayfriend
- .
- Posts: 20957
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
There's one thread about griffins here. Including Donaldson's comments on the subject.
Why were the griffin absent in TPTP?.
This should probably have been posted in the First and Second Chronicles forum.
(This is help, not criticism.)
Why were the griffin absent in TPTP?.
This should probably have been posted in the First and Second Chronicles forum.
(This is help, not criticism.)
.
-
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 1369
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 9:19 am
- Location: Plasticdisguiseville
High Lord Kevin Landwaster gave the First Ward to the Giants.
Didn't he give the Seventh Ward to the Bloodguard!
The Elohim were also given a Ward, Weird or Wyrd.
The Griffin was likely Drool Rockworm and Lord Foul's plan to stop the Defender's finding a Ward, ie the destruction of Soaring Woodhelven.
The Second Ward might have been given to the Ramen before thier expulsion from the Land, and hidden in the Catacombs by brave Kelenbrahbanal.
Didn't he give the Seventh Ward to the Bloodguard!
The Elohim were also given a Ward, Weird or Wyrd.
The Griffin was likely Drool Rockworm and Lord Foul's plan to stop the Defender's finding a Ward, ie the destruction of Soaring Woodhelven.
The Second Ward might have been given to the Ramen before thier expulsion from the Land, and hidden in the Catacombs by brave Kelenbrahbanal.
- Fist and Faith
- Magister Vitae
- Posts: 23620
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 33 times
- Savor Dam
- Will Be Herd!
- Posts: 6152
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 7:02 am
- Location: Pacific NorthWet
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Spoiler
That is covered in The Illearth War.
Love prevails.
~ Tracie Mckinney-Hammon
Change is not a process for the impatient.
~ Barbara Reinhold
A government which robs Peter to pay Paul, can always count on the support of Paul.
~ George Bernard Shaw
~ Tracie Mckinney-Hammon
Change is not a process for the impatient.
~ Barbara Reinhold
A government which robs Peter to pay Paul, can always count on the support of Paul.
~ George Bernard Shaw
- Fist and Faith
- Magister Vitae
- Posts: 23620
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 33 times
Spoiler
Kelenbhrabanal (note the spelling), died before there were Ramen. The Ramen fought alongside Kevin. When he knew he couldn't win, Kevin came up with the whole plan of the Wards. So Kelenbhrabanal was dead before there were Wards.
All lies and jest
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest -Paul Simon
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest -Paul Simon
-
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 1369
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 9:19 am
- Location: Plasticdisguiseville
Hello Bahgoon_The_Unbearabl, and a warm welcome to Kevinswatch.Bahgoon_The_Unbearabl wrote:At the battle of Soaring Woodhelivin, there was a griffin, do you remember?
If not mistaken, wasn't that the first and last flying beast in the Chronicles?
Sorry for the argy-bargy, sometimes it can be like pulling teeth around here.
Anyway, do you remember the giraffe given to Thomas Covenant outside Revelstone at the dawn of the quest for the Staff of Law? It too had wings.
Which demonstrates that Stephen Donaldson has a keen sense of humour.
-
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 1369
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 9:19 am
- Location: Plasticdisguiseville
In some far flung way I think of Thomas Covenant's mustang, Dura Fairflank, as having the capacity for flight ...Bahgoon_The_Unbearabl wrote:At the battle of Soaring Woodhelivin, there was a griffin, do you remember?
If not mistaken, wasn't that the first and last flying beast in the Chronicles?
... something to do with 'the Legend of Berek Halfhand' (the arris tapestry), Douglas Fairbanks' 1924 film The Thief of Baghdad, (magic carpet), and the fact that 'The Land' happens to be a place of high fantasy.
- wayfriend
- .
- Posts: 20957
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
I think that this may have more to do with Donaldson's regret than any in-story reason.
In the Gradual Interview was wrote:The *real* reason that Lord Foul doesn't develop griffins as an air force is that I was ashamed of having intruded one into the story in the first place. *That,* I believed then, and still believe, was a failure of imagination. I should have invented a creature instead of borrowing one from standard mythology. Well, I didn't have any better ideas at the time. But the griffin's presence always bothered me, so I avoided relying on it later in the story.
(10/13/2010)
.
- Cord Hurn
- Servant of the Band
- Posts: 7653
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:08 pm
- Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Well, of course, the author's decision is always the real reason, but that makes a loyal reader want to come up with an in-story reason for why the griffins disappeared, to preserve consistency. And having an explanation that Caerroil Wildwood destroyed the last of the griffins works just fine for that purpose.wayfriend wrote:I think that this may have more to do with Donaldson's regret than any in-story reason.
In the Gradual Interview was wrote:The *real* reason that Lord Foul doesn't develop griffins as an air force is that I was ashamed of having intruded one into the story in the first place. *That,* I believed then, and still believe, was a failure of imagination. I should have invented a creature instead of borrowing one from standard mythology. Well, I didn't have any better ideas at the time. But the griffin's presence always bothered me, so I avoided relying on it later in the story.
(10/13/2010)
- wayfriend
- .
- Posts: 20957
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Agreed.
I think it's a bit unclear exactly why Donaldson felt that Griffons did not "fit". We only knew it had something to do with the fact that they were borrowed from other mythology.
One can immediately write this off as a sort of authorial pride. He wanted to be more inventive and not really on what was previously invented. At one point, he calls griffins "a failure of imagination".
But I think it's a mistake to think it's that. Or only that.
Because in the first Chronicles, Donaldson was carefully managing that thin, blurred line between dream and real. Everything that came from our mundane world into the Land was highly scrutinized by Donaldson so as to maintain the balance he desired. Especially Hile Troy.
So, as I see it, Donaldson's concern may have been more about whether or not griffins provided evidence that the Land really was a dream. Or was not really a dream.
At another point, he calls griffins "a tactical error". I think the general nature of this tactical error is in weakening the dream/real paradox, at least in his view.
I think it's a bit unclear exactly why Donaldson felt that Griffons did not "fit". We only knew it had something to do with the fact that they were borrowed from other mythology.
One can immediately write this off as a sort of authorial pride. He wanted to be more inventive and not really on what was previously invented. At one point, he calls griffins "a failure of imagination".
But I think it's a mistake to think it's that. Or only that.
Because in the first Chronicles, Donaldson was carefully managing that thin, blurred line between dream and real. Everything that came from our mundane world into the Land was highly scrutinized by Donaldson so as to maintain the balance he desired. Especially Hile Troy.
So, as I see it, Donaldson's concern may have been more about whether or not griffins provided evidence that the Land really was a dream. Or was not really a dream.
At another point, he calls griffins "a tactical error". I think the general nature of this tactical error is in weakening the dream/real paradox, at least in his view.
.
- Menolly
- A Lowly Harper
- Posts: 24080
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 12:29 am
- Location: Harper Hall, Fort Hold, Northern Continent, Pern...
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 7 times
- Contact:
Hey guys.
As mod of The Summonsing, I have a quick off topic but on point question. i.e., should I move this thread to The First and Second Chrons forum?
As I have stated previously, I have no problem with off topic discussion here; I've veered off topic many times myself. And, IMO it's nice to have a topic like this here in The Summonsing; I feel it's kind of an intro to n00bs as to the type of discussion which goes on in other areas of the Watch.
However...
I also believe that many Donaldson oriented users may not visit The Summonsing. As such, perhaps being in this forum may be limiting other responses to the topic.
What say y'all?
As mod of The Summonsing, I have a quick off topic but on point question. i.e., should I move this thread to The First and Second Chrons forum?
As I have stated previously, I have no problem with off topic discussion here; I've veered off topic many times myself. And, IMO it's nice to have a topic like this here in The Summonsing; I feel it's kind of an intro to n00bs as to the type of discussion which goes on in other areas of the Watch.
However...
I also believe that many Donaldson oriented users may not visit The Summonsing. As such, perhaps being in this forum may be limiting other responses to the topic.
What say y'all?