Best Sci-Fi Writer
Moderator: I'm Murrin
- The Dreaming
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 11:16 pm
- Location: Louisville KY
Best Sci-Fi Writer
Well, what did you think? I had to vote for the Dean, Heinlein. So many of his works helped to define the Genre.
- Worm of Despite
- Lord
- Posts: 9546
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:46 pm
- Location: Rome, GA
- Contact:
- duchess of malfi
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 11104
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 9:20 pm
- Location: Michigan, USA
- Loredoctor
- Lord
- Posts: 18609
- Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2002 11:35 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria
- Contact:
- Loredoctor
- Lord
- Posts: 18609
- Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2002 11:35 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria
- Contact:
I'm not big into sci-fi for the most part, but Bradbury is always a classic. His shorts are absolutely terrific. I also like sci-fi that's not really by "sci-fi" people--Anne McCaffrey's Killashandra books are a perfect example.
Halfway down the stairs Is the stair where I sit. There isn't any other stair quite like it. I'm not at the bottom, I'm not at the top; So this is the stair where I always stop.
Of those choices, I've read Asimov, Bradbury, Hebert, Clarke, Wells, and of course Donaldson, and while I found their works to be interesting and sometimes entertaining (with the exception of Bradbury, whose writing just irritates the hell out of me for some reason), none of them were also exciting the way SRD's Gap Cycle was for me.
Also, call me a blasphemer, but I really enjoyed the Dune movie and the Children of Dune miniseries more than the books. Maybe I have no taste in sci-fi...
Also, call me a blasphemer, but I really enjoyed the Dune movie and the Children of Dune miniseries more than the books. Maybe I have no taste in sci-fi...
Anyone perfect must be lying, anything easy has its cost, anyone plain can be lovely, anyone loved can be lost.
- [Syl]
- Unfettered One
- Posts: 13020
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 12:36 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Piers Anthony.
.
..
Kidding (though the Bio of a Space Tyrant books were interesting).
For pure sci-fi, my vote goes to Zindell. Wolfe would be first, of course, but there's too large a tilt towards the fantastical.
Would've been nice to see some Phillip K. Dick or William Gibson on the list, though.
.
..
Kidding (though the Bio of a Space Tyrant books were interesting).
For pure sci-fi, my vote goes to Zindell. Wolfe would be first, of course, but there's too large a tilt towards the fantastical.
Would've been nice to see some Phillip K. Dick or William Gibson on the list, though.
"It is not the literal past that rules us, save, possibly, in a biological sense. It is images of the past. Each new historical era mirrors itself in the picture and active mythology of its past or of a past borrowed from other cultures. It tests its sense of identity, of regress or new achievement against that past.”
-George Steiner
-George Steiner
- Loredoctor
- Lord
- Posts: 18609
- Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2002 11:35 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria
- Contact:
- Bucky OHare
- Giantfriend
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:10 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
David Feintuch. His 'Hope' series is the best thing ever written in the sf genre.
Check out my digital art at www.brian.co.za
- Loredoctor
- Lord
- Posts: 18609
- Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2002 11:35 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria
- Contact:
- dANdeLION
- Lord
- Posts: 23836
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 3:22 am
- Location: In the jungle, the mighty jungle
- Contact:
Asimov, hands down. No other writer was as prolific, none was more influential (except H.G. Wells, who I didn't see on the list). The Three Laws of Robotics has been memorized by every junior high school nerd, ever. Star Trek's Data has them imprinted in his positronic pathways (another Asimov invention). The Robot novels alone would have given him my vote, but then there's the Foundation novels, too. Those also would have been enough for me. Now, all those others were great, too. Heinlein, Sturgeon, Bradbury, Clarke, Herbert, and Ellison were close childhood friends of mine. But IMO, Asimov was the best of them. His inventiveness, humor, and ability to predict technological advances was no less than brilliant (Well, except for that time he predicted that man would not reach the top of Mt. Everest in a short story published 2 days after man reached the top of Mt. Everest.... ).
Asimov had the ability to be my best friend, and I never even had the pleasure of meeting him.
Asimov had the ability to be my best friend, and I never even had the pleasure of meeting him.
Dandelion don't tell no lies
Dandelion will make you wise
Tell me if she laughs or cries
Blow away dandelion
I'm afraid there's no denying
I'm just a dandelion
a fate I don't deserve.
High priest of THOOOTP
*
* This post carries Jay's seal of approval
Dandelion will make you wise
Tell me if she laughs or cries
Blow away dandelion
I'm afraid there's no denying
I'm just a dandelion
a fate I don't deserve.
High priest of THOOOTP
*
* This post carries Jay's seal of approval
- Avatar
- Immanentizing The Eschaton
- Posts: 61765
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
- Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Definitely a ground-breaker in my opinion. I think that part of the reason that technology is turning out the way it is, is that the techs read Gibson, and said: "God, this is so cool, let's try and make it."Caer Sylvanus wrote:William Gibson.
dAN, Asimov was definitley one of my earliest introductions to Sci-Fi. I agree with everything you've said about his work there.
--Avatar
- Skyweir
- Lord of Light
- Posts: 25399
- Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2002 6:27 am
- Location: Australia
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
I'm currently just finished NEVERNESS .. danlo's recommendations got the better of me!!
Conceptually NEVERNESS is awesome!! Zindell is without doubt a brilliant mind .. and spectacular thinker!!
But his authorship isnt as tight as Donaldson's .. his story is laboured with excessive detail .. though the details is good!!
Its just not a punchy package! Though in no way can anyone fault its genius!! I loved these books!!
I am going to begin the EA CYCLE .. soon .. but I have lost the 9th kingdom somewhere!! .. dont know much about this series .. am expecting a lot of it though after really enjoying THE NEVERNESS SERIES.
i think ZINDELL should be an option .. also NIX ..
Conceptually NEVERNESS is awesome!! Zindell is without doubt a brilliant mind .. and spectacular thinker!!
But his authorship isnt as tight as Donaldson's .. his story is laboured with excessive detail .. though the details is good!!
Its just not a punchy package! Though in no way can anyone fault its genius!! I loved these books!!
I am going to begin the EA CYCLE .. soon .. but I have lost the 9th kingdom somewhere!! .. dont know much about this series .. am expecting a lot of it though after really enjoying THE NEVERNESS SERIES.
i think ZINDELL should be an option .. also NIX ..
keep smiling
'Smoke me a kipper .. I'll be back for breakfast!'
EZBoard SURVIVOR
Woah! Obviously not a heap of SF lovers on this forum - stands to reason I guess - BUT look at the 'other' percentage.
Some inclusions should have been:
HG Wells
Vernor Vinge
Stephen Baxter
Both Vernor Vinge & Baxter are hard-core SF, with big sales, big ideas, and reference points for a lot of other authors - Vinge, perhaps more so. Actually, the more I think about it the more Baxter is a bit derivative, and the more Vinge breaks new ground. I just wish he would write another goddam book!
Some inclusions should have been:
HG Wells
Vernor Vinge
Stephen Baxter
Both Vernor Vinge & Baxter are hard-core SF, with big sales, big ideas, and reference points for a lot of other authors - Vinge, perhaps more so. Actually, the more I think about it the more Baxter is a bit derivative, and the more Vinge breaks new ground. I just wish he would write another goddam book!
A copious vocabulary is no substitute for intelligence.