Now.. I starving for more.. anyone know the projected date of the next installement in the series? I know I saw a title list of all four proposed books in the Last Chronicles, now I can't find it

myst ...hmmm maybe I'll start over
Moderators: Orlion, kevinswatch
No - I'm with you on that. Then again, I think "Lord Foul" is a dumb name for a villain, so there are some things I've learned to put up with.CovenantJr wrote:Am I the only one who thinks "Shall Pass Utterly", while a nicely poetic phrase, is a pants title for a book?
Yes, "pants" is roughly the British equivalent of that bizarre Americanism about things suckingMrKABC wrote:A "pants" name?
Is that a cute way of saying it sucks?
The first time I read that name, I shared that opinion. But Lord Foul as a name quickly became one of the first things I really appreciated about the Chronicles. Foul possibly doesn't have a real name, and if he does, would he necessarily bother announcing it? So the Landers have to come up with a name for him themselves - hence the various titles (Corruption, the Grey Slayer, etc). There's a mighty being who is pretty damn vile; yep, Lord Foul fits quite well.bossk wrote:I think "Lord Foul" is a dumb name for a villain, so there are some things I've learned to put up with.
But I guess that's my complaint - I liked the other names so much better!CovenantJr wrote:Foul possibly doesn't have a real name, and if he does, would he necessarily bother announcing it? So the Landers have to come up with a name for him themselves - hence the various titles (Corruption, the Grey Slayer, etc).
Whoa, Ageless Stranger returns after a 2 year absence! Welcome back! (We haven't met, heh.)Ageless Stranger wrote:wow...my acct is still working..
does rowling read covenant? if so, thats really cool.
as per the name lord foul, the people of the land arent what you would call urban or technologically advanced or scientific. i think its realistic of donaldson to assume that a broad group of "primitive" (for lack of a better word at hand) people would use a broad and basic term.
think of our own: "the devil." creative.
I'd bet Rowling's books are easier to write. She certainly doesn't have to do as much publicity - people are lining up to buy them the minute they come out.mickwalker wrote:If Rowling can knock out a Harry Potter book every year, you would think SRD could do better than 2007! if Rowling worked like donaldson potter would have had a 30year sabbatical B4 he took on voldermort p.s. im sure voldermort is based on foul!