lurch wrote:Haa!..Its obvious enough that there are individuals upset with ME..coming in here and saying there are other ways to perceive the story, the books, that have given ME, lurch, enjoyment and pleasure, rather than disappointment, bad taste in mouth, an abandoned feeling, and or a sense of just flat out failed by the author...How dare I state ways to see the work that has at least brought me and a few others enjoyment?..Imean..what do you give a person who is not happy?, not satisfied? More reason to be unhappy? Or, Maybe a way to happiness, a way to finding satisfaction....If I say.." I am happy, I am satisfied with what I got,,I'll tell you how it is that I am so. And yes..I'll suggest for one to give it a try...Why wouldn't I?
My assumption has been...that folks don't like being unhappy,,,don't like being dissatisfied and when offered a choice, just might come around to taking a suggestion.
A number of point-ettes arise here and I'm going to attempt to keep this GENERAL, rather than specific.
Had people
actually posted in the manner that has been claimed above, I don't think anyone could possibly have taken offence or been rubbed up the wrong way. Positive and negative takes on the LCs are invariably going to be things of personal expression and so it's completely valid to post one's take on TLD and lay it out there as a
choice, as an
alternative view, as a way of perception that, if considered, might deliver a greater sense of satisfaction or be more revelatory etc etc. It might point the way to something that one hadn't noticed. That'd be a good thing, if so couched.
...If only people had posted in the way claimed above. Unfortunately the above idealistic paradigm is
exactly what did NOT happen - and as such it's an overt retconning of recent Watch history. So blatant that I'm not even going to bother quoting the numerous examples available of waspishly superior sniping. Sadly, rather than being presented with a choice, with someone's necessarily differing personal opinion, those disappointed in the book were more often than not stridently told by those worshipping it that they "just didn't get it", or were "delusional", or were not sufficiently educated or qualified, or were close-minded because they were incapable of "opening themselves" to the author's intent yadda yadda yadda ad infinitum - simply for having a different opinion/reaction (!!!

). Little wonder then that people saw themselves dismissively belittled as inferiors, because the whiff of arrogance was all too redolent. And as Z says, this has been pretty much one-way traffic - from ardent supporters towards the less than satisfied.
However, maybe this represents a watershed moment. I'd say by all means post your reactions to and thoughts upon the LCs, whether positive or negative... BUT remember that they're just a personal opinion. You're offering your views up as a CHOICE, which may or may not resonate with others. And if people don't see things the same way as you do, that doesn't make them emotionally stunted or intellectually challenged in any way... it simply means that they're not you.
I'll add a caveat. Pretty much everyone would agree that the entire Chrons are not just stories - SRD's got deeper messages that he's looking to convey. As such, his works are multi-levelled and will therefore be open to
both emotional
and intellectual interpretation. There is literally no point telling someone that his/her
emotional reaction to the LCs is wrong or off-beam, because it's a self-validating thing... it's the way that the LCs made that individual feel. A personal example - because there is literally no other I can ever give - I'm largely emotionally distanced from the LCs because I don't find that anywhere near enough authorial attention was paid to the demands of the narrative level... but that's just me. I freely acknowledge that others will have had entirely different emotive reactions evoked within them by the same books and that's all good and equally valid for them.
However, when it comes to a purely intellectual interpretation of the more subliminal levels within the LCs, of SRD's messages, of the deeper metaphysical and/or philosophical and/or psychological strata of meaning, then I would absolutely expect there to be debate and opinion/counter-opinion. Why? Because people will express their intellectual opinion as to the meanings within the allegory, the import of the symbolism and evidentially support it with reference to the text. They'll post "I think SRD is telling us about a, because of examples b and c." Others will then inevitably say things along the lines of "Well, hang on. You say a, but elsewhere the text says x and y, so surely conclusion z is more likely". And that's all good too.